2016
DOI: 10.1017/pasa.2015.47
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Globular Clusters in the Galactic Bulge

Abstract: A view of the Galactic bulge by means of their globular clusters is fundamental for a deep understanding of its formation and evolution. Connections between the globular cluster and field star properties in terms of kinematics, orbits, chemical abundances, and ages should shed light on different stellar population components. Based on spatial distribution and metallicity, we define a probable best list of bulge clusters, containing 43 entries. Future work on newly discovered objects, mostly from the VVV survey… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
85
1
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 120 publications
(211 reference statements)
8
85
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The distinction between halo/disc and bulge GC candidates is supported by their estimated metallicities. As can be seen, MW bulge GCs are more metal-rich objects in comparison to those placed in the MW halo/disc (Minniti 1995;Côté 1999;Bica et al 2016). The present GC candidates spatial distribution is more consistent with their physical nature as MW bulge GCs -except those located out of the bulge -than that that comes from considering the heliocentric distances estimated by M17.…”
Section: Analysis and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…The distinction between halo/disc and bulge GC candidates is supported by their estimated metallicities. As can be seen, MW bulge GCs are more metal-rich objects in comparison to those placed in the MW halo/disc (Minniti 1995;Côté 1999;Bica et al 2016). The present GC candidates spatial distribution is more consistent with their physical nature as MW bulge GCs -except those located out of the bulge -than that that comes from considering the heliocentric distances estimated by M17.…”
Section: Analysis and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…In fact, the simulated star clusters and star cluster escapers have a slightly higher value of the velocity dispersion ( 110-150 km s −1 ) than the observed bulge cluster system ( 80-100 km s −1 ). On a side note, we found much better agreement between the velocity dispersion profiles if we also included in our sample of bulge clusters the objects that have been excluded by Bica et al (2016) as suspected halo intruders. Finally, the radial velocity and velocity dispersion profiles of our simulations are in good agreement with the data for the old spheroidal component identified in the Galactic bulge ( fig.…”
Section: The Datamentioning
confidence: 64%
“…The catalogue compiled by Harris (Harris 1996, 2010 edition) contains data on the kinematic, photometric, and dynamical properties of 157 objects classified as globular clusters in the Galaxy. More recently Bica, Ortolani & Barbuy (2016) presented a catalogue of candidate genuine bulge clusters. In this work, we consider the sample of candidate bulge clusters included within the inner 4.5 kpc of the Galaxy, excluding the probable halo intruders identified by the authors.…”
Section: The Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The consideration of the thin plus thick disk in the process is needed, recalling that Snaith et al (2014) proposed that the thick disk stellar population would involve as much mass as the thin disc. Bica et al (2016) select a sample of globular clusters, and report their properties: metallicity, reddening, space velocity, distance, and abundances. Nataf (2016b) reviews bulge reddening derivation from different indicators, which have implications on distances.…”
Section: Morphology and Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%