“…Note that the proximity in the integral space does not imply that the objects line up on the same path on the sky plane, therefore the association with the stream should be examined in the space of observables -celestial coordinates, distances, PM and lineof-sight velocities. This connection was explored in a number of papers, e.g., Law & Majewski (2010b), Bellazzini et al (2020), Arakelyan et al (2020); however, these studies all relied on the old model of the Sgr stream from Law & Majewski (2010a), which was conceived before the more recent observations of its trailing arm, and does not match its features (primarily the distance to the apocentre). When using the model of the Sgr stream from Vasiliev et al (2021), which adequately matches all currently available observational constraints, we find that only the following clusters can be unambiguously associated with the Sgr stream: four clusters in the Sgr remnant -NGC 6715 (M 54, which sits at its centre), Terzan 7, Terzan 8, Arp 2, three clusters in the trailing arm -Pal 12, Whiting 1 and NGC 2419, and one faint cluster Ko 1, which previously lacked PM measurements (and still has no line-of-sight velocity data), but now coincides with the stream in position, distance and both PM components.…”