2020
DOI: 10.1134/s1990341320040021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Globular Clusters Lost by the Sagittarius Dwarf Spheroidal Galaxy

Abstract: In this work a search was carried out for globular clusters belonging to the Sagittarius (Sgr) tidal stream using the analysis of spatial positions, radial velocities relative to the Galactic Standard of Rest (V GSR ),proper motions and ratio of "age -metallicity"

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 98 publications
2
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The rest have membership probabilities pmem 0.01, suggesting that there are no additional known GCs associated with the Sgr dwarf, in agreement with recent analyses (e.g. Arakelyan et al 2021;Johnson et al 2020). Our results do not support recent claims that NGC 5634 and 4147 trace ancient wraps of the stream (Bellazzini et al 2020).…”
Section: The Sagittarius and Orphan Streamssupporting
confidence: 63%
“…The rest have membership probabilities pmem 0.01, suggesting that there are no additional known GCs associated with the Sgr dwarf, in agreement with recent analyses (e.g. Arakelyan et al 2021;Johnson et al 2020). Our results do not support recent claims that NGC 5634 and 4147 trace ancient wraps of the stream (Bellazzini et al 2020).…”
Section: The Sagittarius and Orphan Streamssupporting
confidence: 63%
“…dwarf galaxies). Then, the GCs in our Galaxy could have been stripped from extragalactic bodies (Arakelyan et al 2020). This scenario has been supported by observational evidence (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Note that the proximity in the integral space does not imply that the objects line up on the same path on the sky plane, therefore the association with the stream should be examined in the space of observables -celestial coordinates, distances, PM and lineof-sight velocities. This connection was explored in a number of papers, e.g., Law & Majewski (2010b), Bellazzini et al (2020), Arakelyan et al (2020); however, these studies all relied on the old model of the Sgr stream from Law & Majewski (2010a), which was conceived before the more recent observations of its trailing arm, and does not match its features (primarily the distance to the apocentre). When using the model of the Sgr stream from Vasiliev et al (2021), which adequately matches all currently available observational constraints, we find that only the following clusters can be unambiguously associated with the Sgr stream: four clusters in the Sgr remnant -NGC 6715 (M 54, which sits at its centre), Terzan 7, Terzan 8, Arp 2, three clusters in the trailing arm -Pal 12, Whiting 1 and NGC 2419, and one faint cluster Ko 1, which previously lacked PM measurements (and still has no line-of-sight velocity data), but now coincides with the stream in position, distance and both PM components.…”
Section: Results For the Mean Parallaxes And Proper Motionsmentioning
confidence: 99%