2011
DOI: 10.1080/13645579.2011.611379
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Glocalizing methodology? The encounter between local methodologies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
71
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
71
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We thus find ourselves in agreement with Gobo [30], who reviews the "methods" that have been proposed under the aegis of Indigenous research: informal conversations; talking circles; community discussions about preliminary analysis; detailed plans for reporting research results; interviews; and a collective workshop. Gobo then asks rhetorically: What is indigenous in these Indigenous Methods?…”
Section: Indigenous Methods and Local Knowledgesupporting
confidence: 62%
“…We thus find ourselves in agreement with Gobo [30], who reviews the "methods" that have been proposed under the aegis of Indigenous research: informal conversations; talking circles; community discussions about preliminary analysis; detailed plans for reporting research results; interviews; and a collective workshop. Gobo then asks rhetorically: What is indigenous in these Indigenous Methods?…”
Section: Indigenous Methods and Local Knowledgesupporting
confidence: 62%
“…We relied on personal contacts to gain entry to study sites; because Chinese codes of conduct place primacy on personal networks, 'familiarity' facilitates fieldwork [30], including access and participant trust [40]. In contrast, methods which rely on interviews conducted by strangers risk low response rates and social desirability bias [41,42].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The globalization of social science raises concerns about neo‐colonialist reproduction of core–periphery dynamics between global North and South with regard to methodological practice and norms of knowledge production (Alatas, ; Gobo, ). Colonizing practices of knowledge production rely on the formation and unidirectional spread of methods of knowledge creation that are rooted in a concept of science as ‘the all‐embracing method for gaining an understanding of the world’ (Smith, , p. 68).…”
Section: Globalization Of Management Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%