2020
DOI: 10.5194/essd-12-2043-2020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

GloFAS-ERA5 operational global river discharge reanalysis 1979–present

Abstract: Abstract. Estimating how much water is flowing through rivers at the global scale is challenging due to a lack of observations in space and time. A way forward is to optimally combine the global network of earth system observations with advanced numerical weather prediction (NWP) models to generate consistent spatio-temporal maps of land, ocean, and atmospheric variables of interest, which is known as a reanalysis. While the current generation of NWP models output runoff at each grid cell, they currently do no… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

10
163
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 197 publications
(174 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
10
163
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although station observations are regarded to be relatively reliable at the point where a meteorological station locates, the density of the meteorological station network is generally not high enough to fully describe the spatial distributions of meteorological variables (Shi et al., 2020). From the perspective of spatial coverage, grid‐based data sets (Harrigan, et al., 2020; Mishra, et al., 2011) can be considered as a viable substitute or supplement for station observations when conducting drought analysis. Therefore, the precipitation and runoff data provided by European Centre for Medium‐Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) are used in this study, which are from 1981 to 2019 with a spatial resolution of 0.1°.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although station observations are regarded to be relatively reliable at the point where a meteorological station locates, the density of the meteorological station network is generally not high enough to fully describe the spatial distributions of meteorological variables (Shi et al., 2020). From the perspective of spatial coverage, grid‐based data sets (Harrigan, et al., 2020; Mishra, et al., 2011) can be considered as a viable substitute or supplement for station observations when conducting drought analysis. Therefore, the precipitation and runoff data provided by European Centre for Medium‐Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) are used in this study, which are from 1981 to 2019 with a spatial resolution of 0.1°.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is the process used within the Global Flood Awareness System (GloFAS; https://www.globalfloods.eu/). More details can be found in Harrigan et al (2020). River discharge estimates from ERA5 (GloFAS-ERA5) and ERA5-Land (GloFAS-ERA5-Land) were obtained for the period January 2001 to December 2018.…”
Section: River Dischargementioning
confidence: 99%
“…CC BY 4.0 License. discharge reanalysis (Harrigan et al (2020) and Section 2.3), a product publicly available to users to 5 days behind real time through the CDS. To fill this 2 to 5-day gap between the latest available GloFAS-ERA5 data and real-time initialisation of the GloFAS forecast, the first 24 h period from the single ECMWF ENS CTL member from the preceding days forecast is used as 'fill up' (see Figure 2).…”
Section: Glofas Components Configuration and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The GloFAS-ERA5 reanalysis dataset (Harrigan et al, 2020) provides a spatio-temporally consistent estimate of daily historic river discharge. It is produced for every 0.1° river cell globally from 1979 to the present.…”
Section: Glofas-era5 River Discharge Reanalysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation