2003
DOI: 10.1039/b301293j
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Glow discharge optical emission spectrometry: moving towards reliable thin film analysis–a short review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
50
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These characteristics are mainly achieved due to nonpreferential sputtering rates with low energetic Ar ions, and due to spatial and temporal separation of the atomization process from the ionization processes. Therefore, quantification without typically required matrix-matched calibration standards is possible (Angeli et al, 2003;Hoffmann et al, 2005). Nevertheless, restricted lateral resolution (approximately mm) and specific requirements on shape and dimensions of the sample have been reported (Nelis & Pallosi, 2006).…”
Section: A State-of-the-art Surface Methods For Depth Profilingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These characteristics are mainly achieved due to nonpreferential sputtering rates with low energetic Ar ions, and due to spatial and temporal separation of the atomization process from the ionization processes. Therefore, quantification without typically required matrix-matched calibration standards is possible (Angeli et al, 2003;Hoffmann et al, 2005). Nevertheless, restricted lateral resolution (approximately mm) and specific requirements on shape and dimensions of the sample have been reported (Nelis & Pallosi, 2006).…”
Section: A State-of-the-art Surface Methods For Depth Profilingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Angeli et al [8] have demonstrated that layers of nm thickness can be detected routinely nowadays (see also figure 3). The analysis of layers in a multilayer stack can also be carried out with the same resolution as obtained in more traditional methods of layer analysis, but in a much shorter time and therefore at lower cost, and to greater depths.…”
Section: Later Developmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4,6] The easy application of GD-OES is caused by the experimental simplicity and high sample throughput for analysis (no ultrahigh vacuum is required). One of the main advantages of this method is indicated by a multielement determination in solids.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%