1985
DOI: 10.1007/bf01025564
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Glucose oxidase immobilized on eupergit C and CPG-10 a comparison

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The actual bonding of the enzyme to the film could at worst cause it to lose 2 0 4 0 % of its activity, so the amount would have to be further increased, perhaps offsetting the lower temperature diffusion advantage. Once the enzyme is bound it should have fairly good stability over the 30-60 days needed when it is activated in the presence of water (Wehnert et al 1985).…”
Section: Glucose Oxidase Enzyme Oxygen Scavenger Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The actual bonding of the enzyme to the film could at worst cause it to lose 2 0 4 0 % of its activity, so the amount would have to be further increased, perhaps offsetting the lower temperature diffusion advantage. Once the enzyme is bound it should have fairly good stability over the 30-60 days needed when it is activated in the presence of water (Wehnert et al 1985).…”
Section: Glucose Oxidase Enzyme Oxygen Scavenger Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A major unknown factor is how stable the enzyme will be on the film over time. Wehnert et al (1985) showed that glucose oxidase bound to a plastic surface (Eupergit C) underwent a 50% drop in activity in 2-3 weeks followed by little loss over the next 4 weeks. Hartmeier (1979) and Hartmeier and Tegge (1979) reported on a fairly stable preparation in a gelatin gel matrix hardened with glutaraldehyde and formaldehyde.…”
Section: Glucose Oxidase Enzyme Oxygen Scavenger Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Xylose and XOS (X2, X3, X4 and X5) were used as standards. Since the retention time of X2 and hexose was the same by the HPLC, the amount of X2 was determined by removing the amount of hexose (glucose and galactose) by colorimetric analysis of GOD-POD (detection limit: 0.05 mg/ml) [31] and galactose detection kit (detection limit: 0.04 mg/ml) (Arbor Assays, Ann Arbor, MI, USA). The amounts of unknown components (U1, U2 and U3) were determined by xylose as standard.…”
Section: Enzymatic Production and Evaluation Of Xosmentioning
confidence: 99%