2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.metabol.2005.01.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Glucose transport is equally sensitive to insulin stimulation, but basal and insulin-stimulated transport is higher, in human omental compared with subcutaneous adipocytes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
11
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
3
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, the low PPARG activity in the intra-abdominal fat cells is in line with the high levels of GLUT4 in intraabdominal as compared with subcutaneous adipocytes that were reported by us earlier [23].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Consequently, the low PPARG activity in the intra-abdominal fat cells is in line with the high levels of GLUT4 in intraabdominal as compared with subcutaneous adipocytes that were reported by us earlier [23].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…For both insulin and IGF-I the activation was accompanied by biological effects in the form of glucose accumulation and DNA synthesis. The effect of IGF-I and insulin on glucose was moderate in PA compared to what has been reported for mature adipocytes (33). This is probably due to glucose transport by GLUT1 while insulin sensitive GLUT4 transporters are poorly developed as suggested by the low gene expression.…”
Section: Dna Synthesismentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Several studies have already demonstrated differences between VAT and SAT regarding secretion of inflammatory mediators, gene expression, and cell morphology. Yet glucose utilization between these two adipose compartments remains incompletely understood (710). A recent study shows that AT glucose uptake determined by fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FdG-PET) may complement volumetric measurements of fat for the purpose of risk estimation (11).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%