2020
DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znaa002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Glue versus mechanical mesh fixation in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomized clinical trials

Abstract: Background The optimal choice for mesh fixation in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (LIHR) has not been well established. This review compared the effects of glue versus mechanical mesh fixation in LIHR on incidence of chronic postoperative inguinal pain (CPIP) and other secondary outcomes, including acute pain, seroma, haematoma, hernia recurrence and other postoperative complications. Methods A systematic review of Engli… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…14 Tissue-penetrating mesh fixation is a well-known cause of chronic postoperative pain. 18 , 53 Our findings indicate that avoiding tacks will not increase the overall reoperation risk. A tacker costs approximately $300 to $450 in the US.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…14 Tissue-penetrating mesh fixation is a well-known cause of chronic postoperative pain. 18 , 53 Our findings indicate that avoiding tacks will not increase the overall reoperation risk. A tacker costs approximately $300 to $450 in the US.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Eventually, some randomized controlled trials (RCTs) suggested that the preperitoneal mesh position in itself renders fixation redundant, but this controversy is yet not settled. 13 - 18 …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the continuous development of laparoscopic surgery, the proportion of LIHR procedures has gradually increased, and LIHR has become an important surgical treatment for inguinal hernia ( 12 , 13 ). Compared with previous open tension-free repair operations, it has the advantages of a smaller incision, less pain, and a quicker return to normal activities ( 14 19 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inferolateral margin of the mesh is sutured to the border of the iliopubic tract or shelf of the inguinal ligament to a point lateral to the internal inguinal ring. At this point, the ends created by the opening are sutured together around the spermatic cord [21][22][23][24]. Factors in the popularization of the Lichtenstein technique in comparison with the laparoscopic techniques are its ease of execution with fewer serious complications and the possibility of performing the operation under local anesthesia [12].…”
Section: Tissue Repairsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Almost all the meshes used are made of polypropylene, polyester or polytetrafluoroethylene [30]. Of these three, polypropylene is the most common [22][23][24]. This material may be related to the incidence of inguinodynia, since the reaction it causes with the tissue makes it rigid and inelastic.…”
Section: Mesh Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%