1989
DOI: 10.1016/0896-6273(89)90034-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Glutamate receptor desensitization and its role in synaptic transmission

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

25
260
3
1

Year Published

1992
1992
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 448 publications
(289 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
25
260
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Synaptic currents did not decay completely between pulses at stimulation frequencies higher than 50 Hz, and a significant shift of the baseline current developed. This introduced series resistance errors, and it might also have signaled the prolonged presence of glutamate in the synaptic cleft, which could lead to postsynaptic receptor desensitization (Trussell and Fischbach, 1989;Trussell et al, 1993). Therefore, we did not stimulate at frequencies higher than 50 Hz.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Synaptic currents did not decay completely between pulses at stimulation frequencies higher than 50 Hz, and a significant shift of the baseline current developed. This introduced series resistance errors, and it might also have signaled the prolonged presence of glutamate in the synaptic cleft, which could lead to postsynaptic receptor desensitization (Trussell and Fischbach, 1989;Trussell et al, 1993). Therefore, we did not stimulate at frequencies higher than 50 Hz.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NMDA receptor channels have been shown to mediate the slow EPSCs in central neurons (Forsythe and Westbrook, 1988) and non-NMDA receptor channels have been shown to mediate the fast EPSCs (Hestrin et al, 1990). While step applications of glutamate evoke slow decremental current responses from NMDA receptor channels (Ascher et al, 1988;Mayer et al, 1989) similar stimuli evoke rapidly decaying current responses from non-NMDA receptor channels (Kiskin et al, 1986;Tang et al, 1989;Trussell and Fischbach, 1989;Thio et al, 199 1). The time dependent decay of the current response to a constant agonist concentration is known as desensitization (Thesleff, 1955).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Glutamate is not rapidly degraded and will remain in the synaptic cleft until it is cleared by diffusion. Prolonged application of glutamate induces non-NMDA receptors to desensitize rapidly (Tang et al, 1989, 199 1;Trussell and Fischbach, 1989;Jonas and Sakmann, 1992;Colquhoun et al, 1992), suggesting that desensitization may contribute to synaptic decay. However, it has been estimated by Eccles and Jaeger (1958) for central synapses that because of diffusion only 10% of the peak neurotransmitter concentration remains after 500 msec, and a more recent study (Clements et al, 1992) suggests that 1 mM glutamate might be cleared from the synaptic cleft with a time constant of about 1.2 msec.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%