“…Thus, due to their several applications in the biology and medical chemistry, considerable interest in this transformation has steadily increased in the past decade and several improved procedures have recently been reported using Mg(NO 3 ) 2-6H 2 O [12], Al(NO 3 ) 3 Á9H 2 O [13], ZrCl 4 [14], zeolites [15], silica sulfuric acid [16], BF 3 ÁOEt 2 [17], CuCl 2 Á2H 2 O [18], SbCl 3 [19], RuCl 3 [20], natural catalysts [21], glutamic acid [22], Bi(NO 3 ) 3 [23], Bi 2 (SO 4 ) 3 Á3H 2 O [24], eutectic salts [25], NH 4 Cl [26], SiCl 4 [27], Y(OAC) 3 [28], Cu(OTf) 2 [29], FeCl 3 [30], NH 2 SO 3 H [31], B(OH) 3 [32], acidic ionic liquid [tbmim]Cl 2 /AlCl 3 [33], Bi(NO 3 ) 3 Á5H 2 O-silicagel [34], HCl [35], ZnBr 2 [36], Er(OTf) 3 [37], Phytic acid [38], Fe 3 O 4 MWCNT nanocomposite [39] and Fe 3 O 4 supported Brønsted acidic ionic liquids [40], Fe 3 O 4 supported sulfonated-phenylacetic acid coated [41], etc. Unfortunately, some of these methods are not environmentally friendly and suffer from one or more limitations, such as the use of strongly acidic conditions, prolonged reaction times, high reaction temperature, low to moderate yields of the desired product, tedious work-up, toxicity, and poor recovery and reusability of the catalyst.…”