2020
DOI: 10.1109/access.2020.2974349
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

GNMFLMI: Graph Regularized Nonnegative Matrix Factorization for Predicting LncRNA-MiRNA Interactions

Abstract: Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) and microRNAs (miRNAs) have been involved in various biological processes. Emerging evidence suggests that the interactions between lncRNAs and miRNAs play an important role in the regulation of genes and the development of many diseases. Due to the limited scale of known lncRNA-miRNA interactions, and expensive time and labor costs for identifying them by biological experiments, more accurate and efficient lncRNA-miRNA interaction computational prediction approach urgently need … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To explore their core functionality and key roles in diverse biological and pathological processes, determining the interaction between them is indispensable. In the race to develop more robust and generalized lncRNA-miRNA interaction predictors, predominant computational approaches [6,14,19,20,43,43,74,78,90,91,93,96,97,[100][101][102][103] rely on some kind of known intrinsic information (eg expression profile similarity network, functional similarity) to determine the interaction between lncRNAs and miRNAs. The more comprehensive the information, the better the model identifies potential lncRNA-miRNA interactions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To explore their core functionality and key roles in diverse biological and pathological processes, determining the interaction between them is indispensable. In the race to develop more robust and generalized lncRNA-miRNA interaction predictors, predominant computational approaches [6,14,19,20,43,43,74,78,90,91,93,96,97,[100][101][102][103] rely on some kind of known intrinsic information (eg expression profile similarity network, functional similarity) to determine the interaction between lncRNAs and miRNAs. The more comprehensive the information, the better the model identifies potential lncRNA-miRNA interactions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, a random forest predictor was used to infer potential interactions among miRNA and lncRNA sequences. Similarly, there exist several other lncRNA-miRNA interaction prediction approaches that leverage known intrinsic information of lncRNA and miRNA sequences to determine lncRNA-miRNA interaction in various species [6,14,19,20,43,43,74,78,90,91,93,96,97,[100][101][102][103].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the original data matrix in the real world usually contains very complex information, the NMF method based on a one-layer structure is difficult to mine the high-level features of the data [29]. Inspired by recent advances in deep learning, Trigeorgis et al [22] proposed a Deep semi-Nonnegative Matrix Factorization (Deep semi-NMF) algorithm, which can construct a deep network by factorizing the data many times through the semi-NMF method [31], so that the relationships between the different layers can be exploited to reveal the intrinsic high-level features of the original data.…”
Section: Deep Semi-nonnegative Matrix Factorizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are complex interactions between lncRNAs and miRNAs, such as adsorption, inhibition, competition, etc., [19]. Recently, more and more lncRNA-miRNA interactions have been disclosed by many research efforts [20], [21]. Therefore, in cancer classification, the pure study of the independent regulation of one or more NCGs on PCGs, without considering the interaction between different types of NCGs and the joint regulation of the NCGs' interaction on PCGs, will lead to the loss of key association information for classification and the incapacity of accurately reappearing the complex mechanism of cancer development.…”
Section: A Dataset Constructionmentioning
confidence: 99%