2017 European Navigation Conference (ENC) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/euronav.2017.7954205
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

GNSS interference detection, classification and localization using Software-Defined Radio

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Only continuous wave and narrowband interference were studied with this method in [88] and its applicability to other interference types is yet unknown. [140]- [142]: The C /N 0 is an important measure of the performance of a GNSS receiver, as it indicates undesired decreases in GNSS signal power or the increases in noise power per tracking channel. However, the C /N 0 may change due to several other reasons, such as deteriorated satellite visibility, which can easily mislead the detector [64], [76].…”
Section: Detection Techniques At Post-correlation or Link Levelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Only continuous wave and narrowband interference were studied with this method in [88] and its applicability to other interference types is yet unknown. [140]- [142]: The C /N 0 is an important measure of the performance of a GNSS receiver, as it indicates undesired decreases in GNSS signal power or the increases in noise power per tracking channel. However, the C /N 0 may change due to several other reasons, such as deteriorated satellite visibility, which can easily mislead the detector [64], [76].…”
Section: Detection Techniques At Post-correlation or Link Levelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A jamming signal changes the C /N 0 as it contributes to the noise power, thus this allows to detect jamming. Several approaches were studied in the literature: the difference between C /N 0 and effective C /N 0 was used in [140], the binary hypothesis testing framework was exploited in [141], assuming the C /N 0 normally distributed, and Scaramuzza et al [142] analysed C /N 0 data, in combination with GPS satellite azimuth and elevation angle and as well roll, pitch, and yaw angles. C /N 0 monitoring is also a principal indicator for spoofing detection: a sudden upward jump of the C /N 0 level may indicate the onset of a powerful spoofing attack [64], [74], but also a sudden and concentrated fluctuation of its level may indicate a tracking peak shifting from the authentic to the fake signal [74], [76].…”
Section: Detection Techniques At Post-correlation or Link Levelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Interference events in the global navigation satellite system (GNSS) frequency bands are increasing [ 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 ]. Hence, reliable interference mitigation methods are required to remove these undesired signals and ensure safe GNSS navigation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The techniques for interference detection, localization, and classification can be applied at different stages of the GNSS receiver chain: Front-end (e.g., Automatic Gain Control (AGC) [ 21 ]), pre-correlation (e.g., power detectors such as Time Power Detector (TPD)/Frequency Power Detector (FPD) [ 22 , 23 ]), post-correlation (e.g., Carrier-to-Noise Ratio ( ) monitoring [ 24 ]) or at navigation level (e.g., Sum of Squares detector [ 25 , 26 ]). This section focuses on techniques applied before correlation.…”
Section: Methods For Jamming Detection and Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%