“Go Make Your Face Known”: Collaborative Working through the Lens of Personal Relationships

Abstract

Background:Collaborative working between professionals is a key component of integrated care. The academic literature on it largely focuses either on integration between health and social care or on the dynamics of power and identity between doctors and nurses. With the proliferation and extension of nursing roles, there is a need to examine collaborative working amongst different types of nurses.Method:This study explored experiences of collaborative working amongst generalist and specialist nurses, in community and acute settings. We carried out semi-structured interviews, incorporating the Pictor technique, with 45 nurses, plus 33 other key stakeholders. Transcripts were analysed using Template Analysis. This article focuses on one major thematic area that emerged from the analysis: the significance of interpersonal relationships amongst nurses, and between them and other professionals, patients and carers.Results:Relationship issues were ubiquitous in participants’ accounts of collaborative working. Good personal relationships facilitated collaboration; face-to-face interaction was especially valued. Relationships were recognized as requiring effort, especially in new roles. Organisational changes could disrupt productive personal networks.Conclusion:Relationship issues are integral to successful collaborative working. Policy and practice leaders must take this into account in future service developments. Further research into collaborative relationships in different settings is needed.

Communication between Dutch community nurses and general practitioners lacks structure: An explorative mixed methods study

“…We did not find a significant impact for trust and familiarity on conversation structures, whereas other (mostly qualitative) studies reported that mutual trust and positive interpersonal relations are essential for better collaboration and communication between nurses and physicians [1,3,6,20]. A lack of power and validity of the instruments to measure trust and familiarity in the present study may explain our inability to find similar associations.…”

“…Ineffective patient-related communication between professionals is common in primary healthcare and negatively impacts the quality of care provided [1]. The number of community-dwelling elderly and chronically ill patients with complex multiprofessional care needs is growing [2], meaning that effective interprofessional collaboration and communication in primary care is becoming increasingly important.…”

Inter-Sectoral Collaboration in Municipal Health Centres: A Multi-Site Qualitative Study of Supporting Organizational Elements and Individual Drivers

“…In the terminology of Boon et al [28] these interactions were usually consultative in nature, but sometimes they also involved mutual exchange of information and discussions of treatment options. A recent study among nurses in community and acute settings also found that the professionals appreciated the relational advantages of face-to-face communication offered by co-location [29]. However, in our cases cross-sectoral interactions were mostly sporadic, and most professional work was carried out separately in the two sectors within the health centres.…”

Mental health nurses’ understandings and experiences of providing care for the spiritual needs of service users: A qualitative study

“…The limited realist stance underpinning this study is in keeping with our concern with subjective personal accounts from mental health nurses working in applied healthcare settings. This approach has been successfully used previously in healthcare research, including research with healthcare professionals (King, Bravington, Brooks, Melvin, & Wilde, ; Waddington & Fletcher, ). An inductive, data‐driven approach to analysis was appropriate for this study as our aim was to explore and understand the mental health nurse perspective.…”