2007
DOI: 10.3727/000000007783465172
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Good Manufacturing Practice-Compliant Expansion of Marrow-Derived Stem and Progenitor Cells for Cell Therapy

Abstract: Ex vivo expansion is being used to increase the number of stem and progenitor cells for autologous cell therapy. Initiation of pivotal clinical trials testing the efficacy of these cells for tissue repair has been hampered by the challenge of assuring safe and high-quality cell production. A strategy is described here for clinical-scale expansion of bone marrow (BM)-derived stem cells within a mixed cell population in a completely closed process from cell collection through postculture processing using sterile… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
34
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Through cell surface marker characterization of BRCs, it was determined that the SPP ex vivo cell expansion processing of bone marrow aspirate was capable The cell-processing system employed to produce these cells utilizes an SPP protocol. 20,22,25,35 Gastens et al 35 examined this system and its ability to expand bone-marrowderived cells to produce clinical-scale cell numbers. These initial studies compared cell phenotypes of cells produced with this closed SPP system to phenotypes of cells cultured with an open system utilizing conventional tissue culture parameters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Through cell surface marker characterization of BRCs, it was determined that the SPP ex vivo cell expansion processing of bone marrow aspirate was capable The cell-processing system employed to produce these cells utilizes an SPP protocol. 20,22,25,35 Gastens et al 35 examined this system and its ability to expand bone-marrowderived cells to produce clinical-scale cell numbers. These initial studies compared cell phenotypes of cells produced with this closed SPP system to phenotypes of cells cultured with an open system utilizing conventional tissue culture parameters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This served as an indication that the BRC product was highly enriched with cells possessing mesenchymal and angiogenic potential and is in accordance with previous reports demonstrating enrichment of theses cell types with this cell-processing protocol. 26,35 Although the cell product is highly enriched for vascular and mesenchymal cells as indicated by cell surface marker expression and in vitro differentiation capacity, it is clear that in vitro osteogenic differentiation of cell populations does not guarantee bone-forming capacity in vivo. Meijer et al performed a clinical study evaluating the repair of jawbone defects in six subjects treated with autologous cells expanded using an open system, 39 similar to the protocol used in traditional tissue culture of mesencyhmal stem cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in addition to ethical and political concerns, their clinical application is also severely limited by their lack of accessibility, technique difficulties in purification and manipulation as well as concerns for formation of teratoma. In contrast, adult stem cells (ASCs) which can be easily harvested from various tissues, such as skin [19], bone marrow [20] and adipose [21], might be used clinically to treat disorders of vulnerable vital organs with fewer concerns than ESCs. However, their application becomes less preferable when considering limited numbers, decreased growth and differential capacities with increasing age as well as invasive harvesting procedures [22].…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Growth medium was replaced with DMEM supplemented with 100 nM dexamethasone, 50 lM L-ascorbic acid-2-phosphate, 10 mM b-glycerol phosphate, 10% FBS, and Pen-Strep. After three rounds of induction for 3 days each, the cells were lysed with 500 lL/10 cm 2 of 0.5 N HCl, followed by mixing at 500 rpm for 4 h at 4°C to solubilize the calcium, and centrifugation at 1,000g for 5 min (Gastens et al 2007). 20 lL of the supernatant was used for calcium estimation per manufacturer's instructions (Calcium Quantitative Kit, Pointe Scientific Inc).…”
Section: In Vitro Differentiation Assaysmentioning
confidence: 99%