1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0926-5805(98)00108-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Good practice in briefing: the limits of rationality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
67
0
2

Year Published

2002
2002
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
67
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in contrast to later stages of design and construction where computer‐based techniques and systems are commonplace. The project, which utilized a bottom‐up, dynamic improvement approach, aimed to improve the briefing process through more efficient and effective use of existing and emerging information technologies and expand upon the findings of the `Managing the Brief as a Process of Innovation' project (Barrett & Stanley, 1999).…”
Section: Supporting Briefing (Cobrite)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is in contrast to later stages of design and construction where computer‐based techniques and systems are commonplace. The project, which utilized a bottom‐up, dynamic improvement approach, aimed to improve the briefing process through more efficient and effective use of existing and emerging information technologies and expand upon the findings of the `Managing the Brief as a Process of Innovation' project (Barrett & Stanley, 1999).…”
Section: Supporting Briefing (Cobrite)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The successful development of projects requires, among other conditions, the ability to process requirements. Professionals who design buildings have to deal with well-known problems associated with Requirements Processing (RP) (Barrett et al, 1999;Elf et al, 2012;Jensen 2011;Soetanto et al 2006;Tang et al 2013;Yu et al 2006Yu et al , 2008Yu & Shen 2013) and for decades theories and tools have been developed to manage requirements systematically throughout design phases. However, in spite of good prescriptive guidance (Shen et al, 2004;Ryd, 2004;Yu et al, 2007;Luo & Shen, 2008;Luo et al, 2010Luo et al, , 2011Tang et al, 2013), the poor dissemination of tools that are in line with designers' skills could be a ISSN 0717-9103 ISSN Online 0718-8307 Universidad del Bío-Bío reason for the limited recognition and formalization of the RP process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in spite of good prescriptive guidance (Shen et al, 2004;Ryd, 2004;Yu et al, 2007;Luo & Shen, 2008;Luo et al, 2010Luo et al, , 2011Tang et al, 2013), the poor dissemination of tools that are in line with designers' skills could be a ISSN 0717-9103 ISSN Online 0718-8307 Universidad del Bío-Bío reason for the limited recognition and formalization of the RP process. Some researchers had already found that human inabilities was potentially at the root of RP failures (Barrett et al, 1999;Yu et al 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Muitos autores têm criticado a indústria da construção pela falha no atendimento aos requisitos dos clientes (KÄHKÖNEN, 1999;BARRETT;HUDSON;STANLEY, 1999;LUCK. et al, 2001;EVBUOMWAN, 2002 Building and Construction (1997) define briefing como um processo pelo qual um cliente informa outros de suas necessidades, aspirações e desejos para um empreendimento.…”
Section: Gerenciamento Dos Requisitos Do Clienteunclassified
“…et al, 2001;EVBUOMWAN, 2002 Building and Construction (1997) define briefing como um processo pelo qual um cliente informa outros de suas necessidades, aspirações e desejos para um empreendimento. No entanto, o briefing ainda é considerado como um ponto fraco no desenvolvimento do produto (BARRETT; HUDSON; STANLEY, 1999). Segundo os mesmos autores, um dos problemas recorrentes é que o arquiteto começa a desenvolver o produto muito cedo, com poucas informações sobre os requisitos dos clientes.…”
Section: Gerenciamento Dos Requisitos Do Clienteunclassified