Goods Movement Life Cycle Assessment for Greenhouse Gas Reduction Goals

Abstract

SummaryThe formation of effective policies to reduce emissions from goods movement should consider local and remote life cycle effects as well as barriers for mode shifting. Using uniand multimodal freight movements by truck, rail, and ocean-going vessel (OGV) associated with California, a life cycle assessment (LCA) is developed to estimate the local and remote emissions that occur from freight activity inside and associated with the state. Long-run average per tonne-kilometer results show that OGVs emit the fewest emissions, followed by rail, then trucks, and that the inclusion of life cycle processes can increase impacts by up to 32% for energy and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and 4,200% for conventional air pollutants. Efforts to reduce emissions through mode shifting should recognize that infrastructure and market configurations may be inimical to mode substitution. A uniand multimodal shipping emissions assessment is developed for intrastate and Californiaassociated freight movements to illustrate the life cycle impacts of typical trips for certain types of goods. When targeting GHG reductions in California, it should be recognized that heavy-duty trucks are responsible for 99% of intrastate goods movement emissions. An assessment of future freight truck technology improvements is performed to estimate the effectiveness of strategies to meet 2050 GHG reduction goals. Whereas aggressive improvements in fuel economy coupled with alternative vehicles and fuels can significantly reduce GHG emissions, to meet 2050 goals will likely require zero carbon emission vehicle technology. The value of using LCA in GHG reduction policy for transportation systems is explored. Keywords:air pollution freight transportation goods movement greenhouse gas policy industrial ecology life cycle assessment (LCA)

Health benefits, ecological threats of low-carbon electricity

“…Thus, the model captures important improvements both in material production and in the electricity used in manufacturing. The THEMIS model is documented in a separate method paper [16] and has been applied in a number of assessments [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26].…”

Replacement policy of residential lighting optimized for cost, energy, and greenhouse gas emissions

“…Technology projection and life cycle impact profiles of average 60 W-equivalent 900 lm A19 lamps. (Sources: Bergesen et al [29], Nahlik et al [37], DOE [3,13,14,35,36], DOL [39], EIA [47], EPA [44,45] [35]. It is expected that both IL and HL are being phased out of operation by EISA [6].…”

“…The transportation stage represents only the transportation between the original equipment manufacturer suppliers (defined per DOE's study) and the retailer (assumed at the geographical center of the continental US (Kansas). It accounts for LED weight reduction, [3] improved vehicle technology, and lowercarbon fuels, the latter two of which would decrease the life cycle energy factor and GHG emission factor by 57% and 91% respectively for bunker fuel container ships, and 58% and 56% respectively for diesel trucks by 2050 [37].…”

Back on track? Reassessing rail transport for California's perishable produce

“…To estimate these savings, we utilized existing lifecycle assessment analyses by Nahlik et al (2015) and Facanha and Horvath (2007). These authors found that, due to the fuel efficiencies of rail as compared to trucks, greenhouse-gas emissions associated with freight trains were 0.44 pound lower per ton-mile than emissions associated with trucks (0.11 pound compared to 0.55 pound per ton-mile).…”