Grass is recognized as being beneficial in reducing rainfall infiltration in some kinds of surface cover systems such as landfill cover, because rainwater discharges as surface runoff due to reduced water permeability caused by evapotranspirationinduced soil suction as well as foliage interception. However, the distributions of grass-induced suction in various compacted soils during rainfall are rarely reported. Moreover, it is not straightforward to determine an optimum soil dry density for minimizing rainfall infiltration and at the same time encouraging plant growth. This is because there are conflicting requirements for vegetated cover systems, i.e., compacted soil should not be too dense as to impede root growth, while on the other hand to minimize infiltration. This study thus aims to investigate, quantify, and compare grass-induced suction distributions in silty sand compacted at different densities when subjected to artificial rainfall in the laboratory. A grass species, Cynodon dactylon, which is common in many parts of Asia, was selected for testing. Compacted soil with and without a growing grass patch was tested at three relative compactions (RCs) of 70%, 80%, and 95%, in six test boxes. Test results reveal that at an RC of 95%, suction (40 kPa) retained in vegetated soil after rainfall is 100% higher than that (20 kPa) in bare soil. Among the vegetated soil compacted at the three RCs, suction retained was the highest at an RC of 95% (40 kPa), whereas suction decreased to 0 kPa at an RC of 70% after rainfall. As the average depth of grass roots decreased by 36% due to an increase in RC from 70% to 95%, the depth of influence of suction for vegetated soil at an RC of 95% reduced to less than half of root depth, which was the shallowest among the three compacted soil specimens.RĂ©sumĂ© : L'herbe est reconnue comme Ă©tant bĂ©nĂ©fique pour rĂ©duire l'infiltration de l'eau de pluie dans le cas de certains types de systĂšme de recouvrements de surface, comme les couvertures sur les sites d'enfouissement. En effet, l'eau de pluie s'Ă©coule Ă la surface en raison de la faible permĂ©abilitĂ© Ă l'eau, qui est causĂ©e par la succion du sol induite par l'Ă©vapotranspiration et par l'interception de l'eau par les feuillages. Cependant, les distributions de la succion induite par l'herbe dans diffĂ©rents sols compactĂ©s durant les prĂ©cipitations sont rarement rapportĂ©es. De plus, il n'est pas Ă©vident de dĂ©terminer une densitĂ© sĂšche optimale du sol pour minimiser l'infiltration de l'eau de pluie et en mĂȘme temps favoriser la croissance des plantes, puisque les critĂšres pour les couvertures de vĂ©gĂ©tation ne sont pas les mĂȘmes, c'est-Ă -dire que le sol compactĂ© ne devrait pas ĂȘtre trop dense pour empĂȘcher la croissance des racines mais devrait tout de mĂȘme minimiser les infiltrations. Cette Ă©tude vise Ă investiguer, quantifier et comparer les distributions des succions induites par les plantes dans un sable silteux compactĂ© Ă diffĂ©rentes densitĂ©s lorsque soumis Ă des prĂ©cipitations artificielles en laboratoire. Une espĂšce d'herbe, ...