Governance and Corruption in the Public Sector: An Extended Literature Review

Monteduro, Fabio; Hinna, Alessandro; Moi, Sonia

doi:10.1108/s2051-663020160000005002

Cited by 21 publications

(19 citation statements)

References 49 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Organizational cultures incorporate certain norms, values and beliefs about which attitudes and behaviours are deemed appropriate and good. According to Monteduro et al (2016), social norms can explain some of the causal factors of misconduct, which in turn are influenced by level of education, social development and national characteristics.…”

Section: Theoretical Foundations Of Organizational Misconductmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Cultural theories (Stein, 1983(Stein, & 1985Monteduro et al, 2016;Sims and Brinkmann, 2003) Bending or gaming the rules -Aware of rules but attempt to shift boundary between appropriate and inappropriate conduct, exploiting unclear or inconsistent rules for personal gain -Belief that "anything goes" and "all that is not forbidden is allowed", often with specious post hoc justification (e.g. "I was told not to self-cite") but with evidence of premeditation and/or covering of tracks Rational Choice (Arrow, 1963) Entrepreneurial risk-return perspective (Honig et al, 2014) Cultural theories (Stein, 1983(Stein, & 1985Monteduro et al, 2016;Sims and Brinkmann, 2003 Bounded rationality (March and Simon, 1958;Simon, 1969;Vaughan, 1999) Ambiguity (Fanelli, 2009, John et al, 2012Johnson and Ecklund, 2016). (March and Simon, 1958;Simon, 1969;Vaughan, 1999) Network theories (Ashforth et al, 2008;Breit and Forsberg, 2016) Ignorance and sloppiness -Researchers from different 'cultures' where norms/ conventions different Cultural theories (Stein, 1983(Stein, & 1985Monteduro et al, 2016;Sims and Brinkmann, 2003;Umphress et al, 2010).…”

Section: Sources Of Research Misconductmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…"I was told not to self-cite") but with evidence of premeditation and/or covering of tracks Rational Choice (Arrow, 1963) Entrepreneurial risk-return perspective (Honig et al, 2014) Cultural theories (Stein, 1983(Stein, & 1985Monteduro et al, 2016;Sims and Brinkmann, 2003 Bounded rationality (March and Simon, 1958;Simon, 1969;Vaughan, 1999) Ambiguity (Fanelli, 2009, John et al, 2012Johnson and Ecklund, 2016). (March and Simon, 1958;Simon, 1969;Vaughan, 1999) Network theories (Ashforth et al, 2008;Breit and Forsberg, 2016) Ignorance and sloppiness -Researchers from different 'cultures' where norms/ conventions different Cultural theories (Stein, 1983(Stein, & 1985Monteduro et al, 2016;Sims and Brinkmann, 2003;Umphress et al, 2010). -Lack of experience, research capabilities (e.g.…”

Section: Sources Of Research Misconductmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Towards a taxonomy of research misconduct: The case of business school research

Hall

Martin

2019

Research Policy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper examines the growing pressures and incentives encouraging research misconduct, along with the consequences, as illustrated by the case of business school research. Drawing on a review of the literature on different theoretical approaches to analysing organizational misconduct, we develop a formal taxonomy distinguishing appropriate conduct from blatantly inappropriate misconduct but with a specific focus on the 'grey' areas between these extremes in the form of questionable and inappropriate behaviour. We identify various sources of research misbehaviour and different categories of those affected. The aim is to provide a clearer understanding of what research behaviour is deemed appropriate or not, which stakeholders it affects, and the pressures and incentives likely to exacerbate such misconduct. We conclude with a discussion of how the taxonomy can help shape future good research practice (thereby setting a better example to students), and offer some propositions for future research.

show abstract

Section: Theoretical Foundations Of Organizational Misconductmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Sources Of Research Misconductmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Sources Of Research Misconductmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Towards a taxonomy of research misconduct: The case of business school research

Hall

Martin

2019

Research Policy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Secara umum korupsi dianggap sebagai "benalu" dalam suatu sistem dan organisasi yang merugikan dan menyebabkan pemubaziran dalam penggunaan sumber daya di suatu negara (Monteduro, Hinna, & Moi, 2016). Menurut A ssociation of Certified Fraud Examiners (ACFE), penyuapan, konflik kepentingan antar pihak, pemerasan dalam hal ekonomi, pemberian uang hadiah di luar gaji yang ilegal adalah cabang yang menguraikan korupsi (Tuanakotta, 2012).…”

Section: Tingkat Korupsiunclassified

Akuntabilitas dan Tingkat Korupsi Pemerintah Kabupaten dan Kota Di Provinsi Jawa Tengah

Pramesti

Haryanto

2019

JAA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Salah satu masalah yang harus diselesaikan di negara berkembang adalah masalah korupsi (Olken, 2007). Bukan hanya mengambil sejumlah uang, tetapi tindakan kecil yang mengarah ke tindakan korupsi dilakukan oleh pemegang kekuasaan di Indonesia untuk menyejahterakan dirinya sendiri. Meskipun pemerintah telah melakukan beberapa usaha untuk mengurangi terjadinya korupsi, pelaku korupsi di kalangan pemerintah terus bermunculan setiap tahunnya (Henderson & Kuncoro, 2011). Hal ini menyebabkan citra pemerintah menjadi buruk serta turut memiskinkan negara (Deny, 2018). Reformasi pada tahun 1998 berusaha untuk menjadikan pemerintahan di Indonesia menjadi lebih demokratis dan mengedepankan kesejahteraan masyarakat tetapi belum menyediakan solusi bagi korupsi di Indonesia (Sherlock, 2010). Salah satu buah dari reformasi tersebut adalah Undang-Undang Nomor 22 Tahun 1999 yang mengatur tentang Otonomi Daerah yang diimplementasikan hingga saat ini. Otonomi daerah yang diimplementasikan sebagai langkah desentralisasi adalah salah satu faktor penyebab korupsi (Maulani, 2010), padahal desentralisasi seharusnya menjadi langkah pemerintah mencapai good governance (Lessmann & Markwardt, 2010). Hal ini sesuai dengan

show abstract

“…The basis of good governance is able to provide an efficient and effective governance system that supports the important aim of the government in safeguarding the public interest. Moreover, it can lift the protection of rights, increase accountability and integrity among the public officers in their daily activities (Aziz et al, 2015) According to Monteduro, Hinna, and Moi (2016), the concept of good governance is related to the measurement of governance in terms of efficiency, effectiveness, economy and achievement of social outcome. Based on the study carried out by (Aziz et al, 2015, Hossain 2018, it has been suggested that every department and ministry should produce or report on the ethics and integrity activities.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Good Governance and Integrity: Academic Institution Perspective

Nafi¹,

Kamaluddin²

2019

IJHE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Integrity is one of the moral principles related to moral uprightness. Recently, there are a lot of issues discussed regarding the integrity in public sector administration especially in public sector. Currently governance in public administration has been exposed to public criticism due to the governance failure, fraud, corruption and poor internal control. The purpose of the study is to examine the relationship between factors of good governance and the practice of integrity in academic institution. The factors of good governance include ethical leadership, financial resources and asset management. The study was carried out by using questionnaire and simple random sampling was chosen. The questionnaire survey was distributed to 98 academics from two academic institutions in Malaysia. Such sample was chosen since this study was focused on the academic’s perspective on integrity practice in academic institutions and none of the research has been done in term of good governance and integrity in academic institutions Malaysia. This study found that all three factors of good governance which are ethical leadership, financial resources and asset management have significant relationship on integrity practice in academic institution. The findings of this study can assist academic institutions in Malaysia to improve their governance system and also code of ethics in their organization. In order to improve future studies, it is recommended that the data collection made to be more extensive. This can help in observing the variation of practice of good governance and integrity in academic institutions.

show abstract

Governance and Corruption in the Public Sector: An Extended Literature Review

Cited by 21 publications

References 49 publications

Towards a taxonomy of research misconduct: The case of business school research

Towards a taxonomy of research misconduct: The case of business school research

Akuntabilitas dan Tingkat Korupsi Pemerintah Kabupaten dan Kota Di Provinsi Jawa Tengah

Good Governance and Integrity: Academic Institution Perspective

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About