2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10113-018-1383-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Governing water in federal river basins

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While this broad statement can be challenged across the board using a broad range of case studies, I focus primarily on the Mexican IWRM implementation case as it highlights the realities of public participation in a country with a highly complex institutional arrangement [112], organizational architectures that do not match political and biophysical-geospatial boundaries, and a set of actors with diffuse interests and responsibilities [38]. In theory, IWRM would lead to a more polycentric mode of governance by virtue of engaging stakeholders in river basin councils [113][114][115]. These roundtables are predicated on the value of including multiple users and representatives from academia, civil society, and all three levels of government: federal, state-level, and municipal.…”
Section: Results and Discussion: San Miguel De Allende As A Site Of M...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While this broad statement can be challenged across the board using a broad range of case studies, I focus primarily on the Mexican IWRM implementation case as it highlights the realities of public participation in a country with a highly complex institutional arrangement [112], organizational architectures that do not match political and biophysical-geospatial boundaries, and a set of actors with diffuse interests and responsibilities [38]. In theory, IWRM would lead to a more polycentric mode of governance by virtue of engaging stakeholders in river basin councils [113][114][115]. These roundtables are predicated on the value of including multiple users and representatives from academia, civil society, and all three levels of government: federal, state-level, and municipal.…”
Section: Results and Discussion: San Miguel De Allende As A Site Of M...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A holistic approach demands, however, another scale. Many holistic interdependencies of SDGs 6 and 7 reside at regional levels because they are of physical/environmental (Liu, 2015;Abbott et al, 2019) or technical/political (Platzer et al, 2016;De Stefano and Garrick, 2018;Chazournes, 2009) natures. E.g.…”
Section: Necessity Of a Energy-water Indicator Setmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Liu (2015) and Abbott et al (2019) emphasize the differences in regional basin conditions (that might be modified by human interference), that differ from semi-arid to tropical conditions and influence wide stretches of neither local, nor national nor global land. On the other hand, technical projects (Platzer et al, 2016) and (federal) political decisions (De Stefano and Garrick, 2018;Chazournes, 2009) have wide consequences for sub-national, non-local patches of nations. The local character of the W4EF is not capable of assessing those conditions.…”
Section: Necessity Of a Energy-water Indicator Setmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These whole-basin approaches unite riparian states around the river drainage area as a unit of management, creating supra-national governance structures meant to enable cooperation and adjudication of thorny issues surrounding transboundary water supply, regulation, and management (Zawahri et al, 2011;Thomas, 2017). Recent case studies of hydropolitics and resource allocation in federal states present a clash between centralized or extranational cooperative governance and the autonomy and self-interest of subnational units as independent governing bodies (Garrick et al, 2013;Moore, 2017;De Stefano & Garrick, 2018). As such, despite post-border rhetoric, political borders remain distinct realities, given humanity's desire to control and delimit landscapes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%