Governing Work and Employment Relations in an Internationalized Economy

Abstract

Growing internationalization of economic activity has corroded the capacity of national institutions to regulate work and employment. In this changing context, established international institutions have generally not proved adequate to the resulting challenge. new initiatives have emerged to address the growing regulatory gap at the international level, variously aimed at cross-border flows of capital, labor, goods, and services. Most of these initiatives entail the addition of new institutional arrangements and regulation at the international level alongside, and not in place of, national frameworks. The resulting multilevel arrangements raise particular governance challenges. The solutions conventionally proposed neglect the role of power relations in shaping arrangements and hence their contested nature. This research and policy article examines the academic research on internationalization and work and employment regulation at the national level, the response of established international institutions, and the rise of new regulatory initiatives at the international level. It applies and modifies streeck and Thelen's framework for analyzing different types of gradual change and elaborates ways forward for new, multilevel arrangements that take account of power relations.

When Industrial Democracy Meets Corporate Social Responsibility — A Comparison of the Bangladesh Accord and Alliance as Responses to the Rana Plaza Disaster

“…; Reinecke and Donaghey ). Industrial relations scholars have begun to recognize that the fragmentation of production challenges the ability of trade unions to govern labour standards (Marginson ). First, effective collective bargaining requires embeddedness in a framework of supporting institutions (Howell ), which is often lacking in many developing economies.…”

Trade union participation in CSR deliberation: an evaluation

“…Consequently, new institutional, multilevel, arrangements have emerged and operate concomitantly with established institutions (Marginson, ). For instance, firms are contributing to and operating in accordance with civil regulation or ‘private, non‐state, or market‐based regulatory frameworks’ (Vogel, : 5) in order to ‘compensate for some of the shortcomings of national and international state governance’ (Vogel, : 4).…”

Extra‐Institutional Changes under Pressure from Posting

“…Second, we draw on Marginson (2016) to argue that extra-institutional change may manifest itself in the form of 'forum shifts', where shifts in the dominant decision-making arenas occur. While the formal relations between different decision-making forums may stay the same, the actual importance of different forums may shift.…”

“…It is true that, during the spring of 2008, the Danish government, the trade union confederation LO and the employers' confederation, DA, formed a working group which came up with a quick solution to the legal issues raised by Laval. The inability to solve these dilemmas through collective bargaining have caused a kind of 'forum shift' (Marginson 2016) back to the political arena. Unlike in Sweden, where a lengthy and legally dense report was produced (Bruun and Malmberg 2011), the Danish working group produced a short memo that outlined a pragmatic solution to the issues raised by the Laval ruling.…”