Government for the People? – Unequal Responsiveness of the Bundestag

Abstract

Government for the People? -Unequal Responsiveness of the BundestagAbstract Democratic systems face a steady tension between formal political equality and actual inequalities of their citizens. If disadvantaged groups cannot hope that their interests will have an equal chance to prevail against those of more privileged groups in society, a key principle of democracy is violated. New studies on political responsiveness analyze whether or not decisions confirm to the citizens' will and if so, whose preferences prevails. A number of studies focusing on the United States have found a pattern of selective responsiveness, in which the interests of the poor and median income groups are mostly ignored. In this article, we ask whether similar patterns are discernible in Germany. We analyze an original dataset of 252 detailed survey questions posed between 1998 and 2013. The questions deal with specific political decisions debated at the time and cover a broad range of politically relevant topics. Our results show a notable association between political decisions and the opinions of the rich, but none or even a negative association for the poor. Representational inequality in Germany thus resembles the findings for the US case, despite its very different institutional setting. Against this background, we conclude by discussing potential mechanisms of unequal responsiveness.

How well are citizens represented by their governments? Issue congruence and inequality in Europe

“…In a nutshell, a growing amount of evidence hints towards considerable representation gaps when we move beyond the general left-right axis (Elsässer et al, 2017). Party-voter congruence, for example, is lower on specific issues than on left-right (Thomassen and Schmitt, 1997;Freire and Belchior, 2013).…”

The electoral roots of unequal representation. A spatial modelling approach to party systems and voting in Western Europe

“…One of the troubling findings of the recent empirical literature on the way representative democracy works, is that wealthy citizens hold positions that are generally closer to those of their representatives (Rosset, Giger & Bernauer 2013, Lesscheave 2017, Schakel and Hakhverdian 2018, Rosset and Stecker 2019, have more influence on their representatives' voting behaviour (Bartels 2008) and ultimately on policy (Gilens 2005(Gilens , 2012Schakel 2019, Elsässer et al 2017, Persson et al 2017. In other words, the preferences of richer citizens are better channelled into political institutions and public policy than the preferences of poor citizens.…”

Ungleiche politische Repräsentation und sozialstaatlicher Wandel

“…Neben diesen Argumenten aus dem Bereich der Wohlfahrtsstaatsforschung sind im Feld der empirischen Responsivitätsforschung in den letzten Jahren ebenfalls viele Arbeiten entstanden, die sich mit der (mangelnden) politischen Repräsentation sozial benachteiligter Gruppen befassen. So zeigen diese Arbeiten für eine ganze Reihe reicher Demokratien, dass die politischen Entscheidungen von Parlamenten oder einzelnen Abgeordneten systematisch zugunsten höherer Einkommens-oder Berufsgruppen verzerrt sind, und zwar unabhängig von der regierenden Parteienfamilie (Bartels 2008;Elsässer et al 2017;Gilens 2012 (Oesch 2006). Die einfachen Angestellten sind in Bezug auf Einkommen und Bildung den beiden Gruppen von Arbeitern bzw.…”