Government Intervention, Structural Transformation, and Carbon Emissions: Evidence from China

Abstract

Government intervention and structural transformation play an important role in both the economy and carbon emissions. Based on provincial panel data from China from 2003 to 2020, this paper employs econometric models to investigate the impact of government intervention and structural transformation on carbon emissions. In particular, structural transformation is divided into two indicators: The rationalization of the industrial structure and the upgrading of the industrial structure. According to the research findings, government intervention has significantly promoted carbon emissions and structural transformation has had dual effects on carbon emissions; meanwhile, the rationalization of the industrial structure has significantly increased carbon emissions, while the upgrading of the industrial structure has slowed down carbon emissions, with these findings passing the corresponding robustness test. The relationship between government intervention, structural transformation, and carbon emissions varies significantly over time and across regions. Further investigations revealed that government intervention and structural transformation have a significant impact on carbon emissions in various panel quantiles. Finally, the paper makes policy recommendations in order to provide empirical support for promoting China’s high-quality economic development and achieving the “double carbon” goal.

Environmental regulation, land use efficiency and industrial structure upgrading: Test analysis based on spatial durbin model and threshold effect

“…These adjustments compel polluting enterprises to confront the costs of compliance. Indigenous innovation plays a pivotal role in reducing internal friction related to pollution control [ 132 ], thereby unleashing the “Porter effect” of ER. In current research, some studies leverage the spatial Dubin model for analysis [ 133 , 134 ], yielding insights into the spatial effects of ER on the development of neighboring regions.…”

Analysis of Carbon Emission Projections and Reduction Potential of Resource-Dependent Urban Agglomerations from the Perspective of Multiple Scenarios—A Case Study of Hu-Bao-O-Yu Urban Agglomeration

“…Technology innovation can promote the advancement of new energy technologies and the continuous reduction in usage costs, promote the efficient and clean use of coal as well as the green and low-carbon transformation, and significantly increase the proportion of clean energy represented by hydropower, wind power, nuclear energy, and photovoltaic energy, thus continuously promoting the reduction in energy intensity and the optimisation of the energy structure [51,52]. In addition, technology innovation and environmental regulation are driving the growth of low-carbon sectors such as the tertiary sector, thereby contributing to the restructuring of the industry while reducing carbon emissions [53,54]. The growth in population size will lead to an increasing demand for energy consumption, and in turn to more carbon emissions [55].…”

The New Policy for Innovative Transformation in Regional Industrial Chains, the Conversion of New and Old Kinetic Energy, and Energy Poverty Alleviation

“…As a developing nation, China boasts a vast territorial expanse, diverse levels of economic development, and a varied distribution of energy resources. Due to the economic disparities among regions, the Chinese government must employ policy interventions to harmonize energy development across regions, thereby facilitating comprehensive energy system optimization and fostering long-term sustainability [6].…”