2013
DOI: 10.1080/17487870.2013.780396
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Government interventions and the size of the informal economy. The case of Iran (1971–2007)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In other words, government subsidies can be viewed as an alternative funding source instead of a replacement for private R&D investment. The government can use the "visible hand" to intervene when facing market failure [21]. Government subsidies can reduce the costs and risks of R&D activities, generate financial leverage and spillover effects, and stimulate enterprises' private investment in basic research.…”
Section: Relationship Between Government Subsidies and Randd Investmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, government subsidies can be viewed as an alternative funding source instead of a replacement for private R&D investment. The government can use the "visible hand" to intervene when facing market failure [21]. Government subsidies can reduce the costs and risks of R&D activities, generate financial leverage and spillover effects, and stimulate enterprises' private investment in basic research.…”
Section: Relationship Between Government Subsidies and Randd Investmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the 6NPD, all Iranians must be enrolled in a basic health insurance scheme to assure universal financial protection for the entire population, rather than only for the extremely poor. The mandatory enrollment in an insurance scheme and premium collection from individuals working for an informal sector or unregistered economy [ 13 , 14 ] require extensive provisions. To this end, vast investment in infrastructure and information technologies are needed to collect data or update available data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The shadow economy estimation techniques can be classified into three main categories: direct, indirect, and multiple indicators multiple causes (MIMIC) [ 32 ]. First, in the direct approaches, studies employ surveys, interviews, or tax auditing methods to estimate the size of the shadow economy [ 33 35 ]. Second, studies that fall into the indirect approaches based on some economic indicators to make assumptions about the shadow economy.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%