Government Regulation, Executive Overconfidence, and Carbon Information Disclosure: Evidence From China

Abstract

Climate change has put countries around the world under great pressure to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Chinese government has proposed that China will strive to peak carbon dioxide emissions before 2030 and achieve carbon neutrality before 2060. A low-carbon lifestyle is becoming a new trend in China. Therefore, the products of firms that actively respond to climate change are more popular for consumers in China. In the Internet era, the carbon information disclosed by firms has become an important way for consumers to understand the behavior of firms in responding to climate change. In the existing literature on the influencing factors of carbon information disclosure, the psychological factors of executives are seldom investigated. Using a sample of Chinese listed firms in low-carbon pilot provinces and cities during the period of 2015–2019, this study explores the influence of government regulation and executive overconfidence on the quality of carbon information disclosure. The results show that government regulation has a significantly positive impact on the quality of carbon information disclosure. The results also reveal that executive overconfidence negatively affects the quality of carbon information disclosure. Moreover, executive overconfidence negatively moderates the relationship between government regulation and the quality of carbon information disclosure. Our findings make a significant contribution to the role of executive’s psychological factors in firm’s behaviors and provide new insights and policy implications for government, firms, consumers, and other stakeholders.

Executive Overconfidence, Digital Transformation and Environmental Innovation: The Role of Moderated Mediator

“…Scholars have proven that overconfidence can promote the innovation activities of enterprises [12]. It has been recognized that overconfident executives have optimistic and aggressive proactive personalities and are more willing to take risks and perform activities with high investment, high risk, and high uncertainty [13]. Given this, our study extends executive overconfidence to the research category of environmental innovation.…”

Research on the masking effect of vertical interlock on ESG greenwashing in the context of sustainable Enterprise development

“…The need for social responsibility caused by sustainable development has reshaped the development concept of all countries. China is the second largest economy in the world and plays an important role in green development and other aspects (He et al, 2021). In September 2020, at the 75th session of the United Nations General Assembly, China made a solemn commitment to the world to reach a “carbon peak” by 2030 and strive for “carbon neutrality” by 2060.…”

Carbon information disclosure quality, greenwashing behavior, and enterprise value

“…In deteriorating living environments, there is a global consensus to curb greenhouse gas emissions and achieve the sustainable development of human beings. Most countries believe that a low-carbon economy is an effective solution to the problem of climate change and has become the development trend of the current global economy ( Ionescu, 2021 ; He et al, 2022 ).…”

“…As one of the largest carbon emitters in the world, China is also a participant in constructing a global ecological civilization and actively demonstrates its responsibility as a major country in the global carbon reduction course ( He et al, 2022 ). In 2015, at the Paris Climate Conference, China committed to reduce carbon emissions per unit of GDP by 60%–65% from 2005 to 2030 ( Tollefson, 2016 ).…”

“…Being cells of the national economy, enterprises are the main sources of carbon emissions ( He et al, 2022 ). As an important way for enterprises to show their carbon emission data and low-carbon behavior to stakeholders, carbon information disclosure has attracted increasing attention from academia and the public.…”