2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.clsr.2009.03.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Governmental filtering of websites: The Dutch case

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Netherlands is an example in this regard. Stol et al (2008) provide an overview of the historic background with respect to efforts to request ISPs to filter traffic to block child pornographic material. In 2006, Parliament filed a motion to research such possibilities.…”
Section: Child Pornographymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Netherlands is an example in this regard. Stol et al (2008) provide an overview of the historic background with respect to efforts to request ISPs to filter traffic to block child pornographic material. In 2006, Parliament filed a motion to research such possibilities.…”
Section: Child Pornographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This led to much criticism from the remainder of the ISP community. The debate died a slow death in the Netherlands, especially after legal research labeled the request to block as illegitimate (Stol et al 2008). The police provided a list of sites to be blocked by ISPs.…”
Section: Child Pornographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a surprisingly difficult question to answer as few blocking systems set explicit objectives (see e.g. Stol et al 2009). This (sometimes deliberate) vagueness reflects a tension between two competing factors -a political tendency to oversell what can be achieved and the technical realities which limit what can be done.…”
Section: Effectivenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A study commissioned by the government found that this was unlawful and contrary to Article 10 ECHR in that it lacked any specific legal basis -ultimately forcing it to be abandoned (Stol et al 2008;Stol et al 2009). Remarkably, however, when this system was found to be illegal, the response of the Dutch government was not to provide a legal basis, but instead to try to further privatise blocking.…”
Section: Regret To Inform You That the Home Office Does Not Hold Thmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation