2020
DOI: 10.1109/access.2020.2988333
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

GPR Clutter Reduction by Robust Orthonormal Subspace Learning

Abstract: The clutter severely decreases the target visibility, thus the detection rates in ground penetrating radar (GPR) systems. Recently proposed robust principal component analysis (RPCA) based clutter removal method decomposes the GPR image into its low rank and sparse parts corresponding to clutter and target components. Motivated by its encouraging results, many lower complexity low rank and sparse decomposition (LRSD) methods such as go decomposition (GoDec) or robust non-negative matrix factorization (RNMF) ha… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The original image is decomposed into two parts: clutter and target by ROSL. It performs better than robust principal component analysis (RPCA), go decomposition (GoDec), and other algorithms [45]. In 2022, Fok Hing Chi Tivive and others proposed the multilevel projective dictionary learning with low-rank prior (MPDL-LR) model [46], which uses a multilevel projective dictionary method to estimate radar trace signals.…”
Section: Dictionary Learning (Dl)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The original image is decomposed into two parts: clutter and target by ROSL. It performs better than robust principal component analysis (RPCA), go decomposition (GoDec), and other algorithms [45]. In 2022, Fok Hing Chi Tivive and others proposed the multilevel projective dictionary learning with low-rank prior (MPDL-LR) model [46], which uses a multilevel projective dictionary method to estimate radar trace signals.…”
Section: Dictionary Learning (Dl)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Robust principal component analysis (RPCA) [21], which decomposes the GPR image into a low-rank clutter matrix and a sparse target matrix, has demonstrated its superiority to the conventional subspace-based methods in GPR clutter removal [22,23]. Motivated by its success, various low-rank and sparse decomposition (LRSD) methods are successively proposed [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31]. Song et al [24] presented an improved RPCA method that focuses on the target response by migration imaging, followed by suppressing the clutter using the RPCA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They also presented a two-step GoDec approach for cases with missing data [28]. Moreover, they exploited a robust orthonormal subspace learning (ROSL) method for GPR clutter reduction [29]. This method has a faster implementation and comparable performance to GoDec and RNMF without presetting the parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be seen that although these methods can suppress noise to a certain extent, they all have some shortcomings. In terms of removing clutter, principal component analysis (PCA) [28], independent component analysis (ICA) [29], morphological component analysis (MCA) [30], non-negative matrix factorization (NMF) [31], go decomposition (GoDec) [32], robust matrix factorization (RMF) [33], robust orthonormal subspace learning (ROSL) [34], robust PCA (RPCA) [35], [36], and tensor RPCA (TRPCA) [37], [38] are all good methods. They divide GPR data into two categories through different methods, one corresponding to the clutter and the other corresponding to the target signal, thus achieving the purpose of clutter removal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%