2010 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology 2010
DOI: 10.1109/iembs.2010.5627497
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

GPU accelerated FDTD solver and its application in MRI

Abstract: The finite difference time domain (FDTD) method is a popular technique for computational electromagnetics (CEM). The large computational power often required, however, has been a limiting factor for its applications. In this paper, we will present a graphics processing unit (GPU)-based parallel FDTD solver and its successful application to the investigation of a novel B1 shimming scheme for high-field magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The optimized shimming scheme exhibits considerably improved transmit B(1) p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figures 2 , 4 , and 8 demonstrate that the B 1 -RRFC could provide representative MR images without the application of transverse B 0 gradients. Since the numerical simulations take considerable time to be solved, it would be viable to accelerate the computation by a factor of up to one hundred by employing parallel computing or graphical processing units as detailed in [ 27 , 28 ]. The use of the pseudo-inverse to solve ( 4 ) results in intensity deviations from the original image that are smaller than when LSQR or Bloch-LSQR approaches are applied.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figures 2 , 4 , and 8 demonstrate that the B 1 -RRFC could provide representative MR images without the application of transverse B 0 gradients. Since the numerical simulations take considerable time to be solved, it would be viable to accelerate the computation by a factor of up to one hundred by employing parallel computing or graphical processing units as detailed in [ 27 , 28 ]. The use of the pseudo-inverse to solve ( 4 ) results in intensity deviations from the original image that are smaller than when LSQR or Bloch-LSQR approaches are applied.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another important issue for high-field imaging is shimming, i.e. the removal of inhomogeneities in the magnetic field, which can also be computationally costly (Chi et al, 2010).…”
Section: Mrimentioning
confidence: 99%