Grad der binokularen Pseudoakkommodation mit einer apodisierten, diffraktiven und trifokalen Multifokallinse

Kretz, Florian; Attia, M.; Linz, Katharina; Auffarth, Gerd U.

doi:10.1055/s-0035-1545833

Cited by 4 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 9 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…More recently, accommodating IOL models are being tested and new technologies are being developed [ 7 ]. Another technical approach to define true intermediate vision has been the development of trifocal IOLs [ 2 3 5 6 15 16 17 ]. The third focal point induced by a second diffractive structure also reduces the loss of light compared to other diffractive bifocal IOLs by offering true intermediate visual acuity [ 18 ].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Clinical Evaluation of Functional Vision of +1.5 Diopters near Addition, Aspheric, Rotational Asymmetric Multifocal Intraocular Lens

Kretz

Khoramnia

Attia

et al. 2016

Korean J Ophthalmol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PurposeTo evaluate postoperative outcomes and visual performance in intermediate distance after implantation of a +1.5 diopters (D) addition, aspheric, rotational asymmetric multifocal intraocular lens (MIOL).MethodsPatients underwent bilateral cataract surgery with implantation of an aspheric, asymmetric MIOL with +1.5 D near addition. A complete ophthalmological examination was performed preoperatively and 3 months postoperatively. The main outcome measures were monocular and binocular uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), uncorrected intermediate visual acuity (UIVA), distance corrected intermediate visual acuity (DCIVA), uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA) and distance corrected keratometry, and manifest refraction. The Salzburg Reading Desk was used to analyze unilateral and bilateral functional vision with uncorrected and corrected reading acuity, reading distance, reading speed, and the smallest log-scaled print size that could be read effectively at near and intermediate distances.ResultsThe study comprised 60 eyes of 30 patients (mean age, 68.30 ± 9.26 years; range, 34 to 80 years). There was significant improvement in UDVA and CDVA. Mean UIVA was 0.01 ± 0.09 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) and mean DCIVA was -0.02 ± 0.11 logMAR. In Salzburg Reading Desk analysis for UIVA, the mean subjective intermediate distance was 67.58 ± 8.59 cm with mean UIVA of -0.02 ± 0.09 logMAR and mean word count of 96.38 ± 28.32 words/min.ConclusionsThe new aspheric, asymmetric, +1.5 D near addition MIOL offers good results for distance visual function in combination with good performance for intermediate distances and functional results for near distance.

show abstract