2020
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.19.21921
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Grade 3 Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors on MDCT: Establishing a Diagnostic Model and Comparing Survival Against Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unlike NEN in the gastrointestinal tract and pancreas that have their own staging system, GB‐NEN are routinely staged using the same system as gallbladder adenocarcinomas. However, the clinical course and patient prognosis of NEN usually differ from those of the adenocarcinomas at the same site 51,52 . A multivariate survival analysis in our study failed to show that advanced tumor was an independent risk factor for GB‐NEC, which was in consistent with a previous study 1 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Unlike NEN in the gastrointestinal tract and pancreas that have their own staging system, GB‐NEN are routinely staged using the same system as gallbladder adenocarcinomas. However, the clinical course and patient prognosis of NEN usually differ from those of the adenocarcinomas at the same site 51,52 . A multivariate survival analysis in our study failed to show that advanced tumor was an independent risk factor for GB‐NEC, which was in consistent with a previous study 1 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…However, the clinical course and patient prognosis of NEN usually differ from those of the adenocarcinomas at the same site. 51,52 A multivariate survival analysis in our study failed to show that advanced tumor was an independent risk factor for GB-NEC, which was in consistent with a previous study. 1 In addition, we found that lymph node metastasis and lymphadenectomy had no effect on the median OS of the patients.…”
Section: Factors Associated With Patient Survivalsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In this study, furthermore, we devised a nomogram model incorporating clinical features, including jaundice, age, and tumor size, which exhibited good performance in predicting PNENs with a ki67 index > 55%. The performance of our model was comparable to that of imaging-based models [ 3 , 6 ]. However, our study was a single center study with limited sample size.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Recently, another study found that blood concentration of FAS ligand (FASLG) was lower in 42 PanNEN G-3 compared to controls, and that positive FASLG immunoreactivity in tumor cells correlated with well-differentiated morphology (14/42 evaluable samples) [ 34 ]; suggesting that FASLG could be a future candidate biomarker. Finally, PanNET G-3 rarely show high levels of carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19–9 compared with pancreatic adenocarcinoma [ 35 ]. These preliminary results on biomarker assessments in NET G-3 need confirmation by future studies.…”
Section: Epidemiological Features and Tumor Presentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding PanNEN, one study showed that OS for both NET G-2 and NET G-3 patients was similar (67.8 and 54.1 months, respectively; p = 0.02) and significantly higher than for NEC patients (11 months) [ 7 ]. Patients with PanNET G-3 also show better OS than those with ductal pancreatic adenocarcinoma [ 35 ]. These results indicate that NET G-3′s prognosis falls in between that of NET G-2 and NEC, and more data are needed for non-pancreatic lesions.…”
Section: Epidemiological Features and Tumor Presentationmentioning
confidence: 99%