AIAA Scitech 2019 Forum 2019
DOI: 10.2514/6.2019-1219
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gradient-Based Propeller Optimization with Acoustic Constraints

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[20] This implementation, called OpenBEMT, has been previously used to predict performance for a design optimization of an aircraft based on NASA's X-57 electric distributed propulsion concept, [21] and it has also been used as part of a proof-of-concept coupled trajectory-acoustic optimization for the small single person RVLT UAM quad-rotor concept. [22] In this work, OpenBEMT is used to predict the performance of the tiltwing's four propellers with the simplifying assumption that each propeller was an isolated system and therefore the analysis did do not capture interactions between the individual rotors or between the wing and the rotors. These assumptions are significant limitations to the quality of the physical representation produced by this modeling tool, and it recognized that higher-fidelity physics models are necessary for this discipline to capture rotorcraft performance in future work.…”
Section: Rotor/propeller Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[20] This implementation, called OpenBEMT, has been previously used to predict performance for a design optimization of an aircraft based on NASA's X-57 electric distributed propulsion concept, [21] and it has also been used as part of a proof-of-concept coupled trajectory-acoustic optimization for the small single person RVLT UAM quad-rotor concept. [22] In this work, OpenBEMT is used to predict the performance of the tiltwing's four propellers with the simplifying assumption that each propeller was an isolated system and therefore the analysis did do not capture interactions between the individual rotors or between the wing and the rotors. These assumptions are significant limitations to the quality of the physical representation produced by this modeling tool, and it recognized that higher-fidelity physics models are necessary for this discipline to capture rotorcraft performance in future work.…”
Section: Rotor/propeller Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aeroacoustic model used the Ffowcs-Williams and Hawkings (FW-H) analogy [3] to predict the tonal noise produced by the propeller. Ingraham et al [4] also use a BEMT propeller model coupled with FW-H for a propeller optimisation study. That method used analytical derivatives applied in an efficient gradient based optimisation process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 However, this unconventional aircraft configuration poses technical challenges that still remain to be solved. 6 A strong noise signature 7,8 and a complicated transition maneuver 9,10 are examples of the challenges encountered in eVTOL aircraft, both stemming in some degree from the aerodynamic interactions between rotors and lifting surfaces. 11 As an example of eVTOL configuration, Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%