1973
DOI: 10.1021/bi00743a009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gradient sievorptive chromatography. Focusing system for the separation of cellular components

Abstract: Chromatographic systems that employ an active combination of molecular sieve and adsorption chromatography are useful for the rapid purification of enzymes. Such systems, called sievorptive chromatography, will separate either strongly interacting macromolecules or similar macromolecules under conditions of maximal resolution. If ap-

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1974
1974
1985
1985

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Application of these analyses to the calf liver enzyme indicated a single species of the enzyme; however, the elution profiles of the enzyme off of the initial DEAE fractionation sometimes suggested heterogeneity of the enzyme (see Figure 1A). Sievorptive chromatography (Kirkegaard, 1973), which actively combines molecular sieve (gel filtration) and ion-exchange adsorption chromatography, was employed to try and resolve possible ionic forms of the enzyme.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Application of these analyses to the calf liver enzyme indicated a single species of the enzyme; however, the elution profiles of the enzyme off of the initial DEAE fractionation sometimes suggested heterogeneity of the enzyme (see Figure 1A). Sievorptive chromatography (Kirkegaard, 1973), which actively combines molecular sieve (gel filtration) and ion-exchange adsorption chromatography, was employed to try and resolve possible ionic forms of the enzyme.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This procedure is the ion filtration technique as described by Kirkegaard et al (1972). The effluent (10 mL) containing RNA polymerase activity was concentrated to 3.4 mL by application at 0.35 ( 4)2$04 to a 30-mL DEAE-Sephadex column equilibrated at 0.1 M (NH4)2S04 in TGMED and eluted with 0.45 M (NH4)2S04 in TGMED (although not previously described, this concentration method is a direct consequence of the ion filtration and gradient sievorptive elution phenomena; for full discussion of these phenomena, see Kirkegaard et al, 1972, andKirkegaard, 1973). The effluent (3.4 mL) from the concentration column was resolved into RNA polymerases I, II, and III by gradient sievorptive elution on a 30-mL DEAE-Sephadex column as previously described Morris & Rutter, 1976).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resulting supernatant fraction was adjusted to 70% saturation by the addition of 0.21 g/mL of ammonium sulfate and centrifuged as before. The 40-70% ammonium sulfate pellet, which contains all the DNA ligase activity, was dissolved in 0.75 M KC1 and purified by gradient sievorptive chromatography (Kirkegaard, 1973). The sample was applied to a 350-mL DEAE-Sephadex A-25 column containing a linear gradient of from 0 to 125 mM KC1 in 0.1 M Tris (pH 7.5)-1 mM 2-mercaptoethanol-0.1 mM EDTA and was eluted with 1 M KC1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%