2021
DOI: 10.3390/ma14051114
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gradual Degradation of InGaAs LEDs: Impact on Non-Radiative Lifetime and Extraction of Defect Characteristics

Abstract: We present a detailed analysis of the gradual degradation mechanisms of InGaAs Light-Emitting Diodes (LEDs) tuned for optical emission in the 1.45–1.65 μm range. Specifically, we propose a simple and effective methodology for estimating the relative changes in non-radiative lifetime, and a procedure for extracting the properties of defects responsible for Shockley-Read-Hall recombination. By means of a series of accelerated aging experiments, during which we evaluated the variations of the optical and electric… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our research results indicate that a lower ∆P n.∆I of UVC LEDs occurred when LEDs were supplied with higher current (Figure 5), which means an increase in the junction temperature [20,51]. The observed rapid drop in the ∆OP n.∆I coefficient for low currents after degradation may be caused by the increase in nonradiative recombination.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Our research results indicate that a lower ∆P n.∆I of UVC LEDs occurred when LEDs were supplied with higher current (Figure 5), which means an increase in the junction temperature [20,51]. The observed rapid drop in the ∆OP n.∆I coefficient for low currents after degradation may be caused by the increase in nonradiative recombination.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…At low current levels, LED B had a slope of about 2, indicating a regime where non-radiative recombination prevails [27,28]. LED D showed a lower slope but it presented the highest increase, which could be ascribed to a stronger generation of non-radiative centers in the device [28]. The same behavior could be found in the other two LEDs, indicating that optical degradation may be partially correlated to a defect generation.…”
Section: Optical Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…For LED B and D, the slopes increased with stress time, indicating a stronger contribution of non-radiative recombination processes also in high carrier injection conditions. At low current levels, LED B had a slope of about 2, indicating a regime where non-radiative recombination prevails [27,28]. LED D showed a lower slope but it presented the highest increase, which could be ascribed to a stronger generation of non-radiative centers in the device [28].…”
Section: Optical Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…When measured at high current, all devices presented a slope of about 1 before the stress, which can be associated with the regime where the radiative recombination prevails; as the stress time proceeds the slope tends to increase, and at higher stress currents the increase is steeper, suggesting a correlation with the growth of Shockley-Read-Hall (SRH) recombination rate. [15] The slopes measured at low current levels have an initial slope of 2 or higher, which indicates that the devices are operating in the regime where prevails nonradiative recombination processes [16,17] and possibly asymmetrical injection. [18] The low current L-I slopes presented an increasing trend during the aging similar to the high current ones.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%