2006
DOI: 10.21273/hortsci.41.6.1389
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Graft Compatibility Between Peach Cultivars and Prunus Rootstocks

Abstract: Trials were established at Aula Dei Experimental Station (EEAD-CSIC, Zaragoza, Spain) to assess graft compatibility between peach cultivars [Prunus persica (L.) Batsch] and new Prunus spp. rootstocks or selections. Peach cvs. `Catherina' and `Tebana' and nectarine cvs. `Big Top' and `Summergrand' were grafted on peach seedlings, plum rootstocks, almond × peach hybrids, and other interspecific rootstocks. Part of the evaluated material belongs to the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

6
65
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
6
65
1
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, SPAD values characterizing the chlorophyll content were not significantly different from those of trees grafted on Capdeboscq and Tsukuba1. The overgrowth at the graft interface, tree vigour reduction, and less index of survival in the Chimarrita/Umezeiro combination suggested symptoms of graft incompatibility (Herrero 1951, Mosse 1962, Moreno et al 1993, Zarrouk et al 2006. Despite that Umezeiro is considered as a promising rootstock for peach trees due to canopy vigour reduction, good fruit quality, and resistance to root-knot nematodes, these signs of incompatibility should be taken into account (Teles et al 2009, Comiotto et al 2012.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, SPAD values characterizing the chlorophyll content were not significantly different from those of trees grafted on Capdeboscq and Tsukuba1. The overgrowth at the graft interface, tree vigour reduction, and less index of survival in the Chimarrita/Umezeiro combination suggested symptoms of graft incompatibility (Herrero 1951, Mosse 1962, Moreno et al 1993, Zarrouk et al 2006. Despite that Umezeiro is considered as a promising rootstock for peach trees due to canopy vigour reduction, good fruit quality, and resistance to root-knot nematodes, these signs of incompatibility should be taken into account (Teles et al 2009, Comiotto et al 2012.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the availability of such a rootstock material and potential for introgression of a dominant Ma gene from P. cerasifera into commercial peach rootstocks to broaden resistances, Myrobalan plum rootstocks have not been successfully utilized in south‐eastern USA breeding programmes because of their susceptibility to peach tree short life, Armillaria root rot, and plum leaf scald (Beckman & Pusey, ; Okie, Reighard, et al., ; Reighard, ). In addition, incompatibilities have been reported for most peach and plum ( P. cerasifera and P. salicina ) graft combinations (Moreno, Moing, Lansac, Gaudillere, & Salesses, ; Salesses & Bonnet, ; Zarrouk, Gogorcena, Moreno, & Pinochet, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are also tolerant to calcareous soils (Gogorcena et al, 2004;Jiménez et al, 2008), and they provide the possibility to overcome replanting problems (Nicotra and Moser, 1997). However, many peach cultivars exhibit graft incompatibility when grafted onto some plum rootstocks (Moreno et al, 1994a;Zarrouk et al, 2006). Manifestations of peach/plum incompatibility appear generally during the first summer after grafting, although symptoms can also be delayed for several years (Moreno et al, 1993), and are typically evident by translocated incompatibility symptoms (Zarrouk et al, 2006).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, many peach cultivars exhibit graft incompatibility when grafted onto some plum rootstocks (Moreno et al, 1994a;Zarrouk et al, 2006). Manifestations of peach/plum incompatibility appear generally during the first summer after grafting, although symptoms can also be delayed for several years (Moreno et al, 1993), and are typically evident by translocated incompatibility symptoms (Zarrouk et al, 2006). They are expressed by tree growth cessation and premature tree defoliation (Herrero, 1951) caused by a phloem dysfunction (Moing and Carde, 1988;Schmid and Feucht, 1981) and biochemical alterations at the graft interface (Moing et al, 1987).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation