2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2021.10.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Graft Plus Fasciocutaneous Penile Flap for Nearly or Completely Obliterated Long Bulbar and Penobulbar Strictures

Abstract: Background Graft plus flap urethroplasty is gaining momentum in patients with nearly or completely obliterated urethral strictures, in whom staged procedures or perineal urethrostomy is the only possible alternative. However, graft plus flap urethroplasty is mainly adopted for strictures involving the penile urethra. Objective To report our experience on graft plus flap urethroplasty for bulbar and penobulbar reconstruction. Design, setting, and participa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The combined technique of Joshi et al using buccal graft dorsally plus fasciocutaneous penile flap ventrally could be a feasible option, augmenting the urethra up to a 28.6 French caliper, however, requiring an additional circumcising subcoronal incision. He reported in a series of 15 patients a primary success rate of 86.7%, defined as no need for any kind of instrumentation, while the secondary success rate was 73.3%, defined as a Qmax under 10 ml/s or new obstructive LUTS [15]. Although we occasionally use Joshi's technique, in this case, given the severe spongiofibrosis and compromised tissue vascularization, we preferred a staged technique to maximize the chances of graft take.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The combined technique of Joshi et al using buccal graft dorsally plus fasciocutaneous penile flap ventrally could be a feasible option, augmenting the urethra up to a 28.6 French caliper, however, requiring an additional circumcising subcoronal incision. He reported in a series of 15 patients a primary success rate of 86.7%, defined as no need for any kind of instrumentation, while the secondary success rate was 73.3%, defined as a Qmax under 10 ml/s or new obstructive LUTS [15]. Although we occasionally use Joshi's technique, in this case, given the severe spongiofibrosis and compromised tissue vascularization, we preferred a staged technique to maximize the chances of graft take.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, the effect of predictive factors on risk of failure of ventral BMG urethroplasty was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using log-rank tests. Fourth, for those patients who failed ventral BMG urethroplasty and underwent a rescue treatment, namely, DVIU vs open urethroplasty with graft or flaps [21], the probability of success after retreatment was assessed. Furthermore, to assess the effect of repeat DVIU vs open surgery, we analysed the risk of failure at 12 months with Kaplan-Meier and regression tree analyses in patients receiving only rescue DVIU (91 patients), or second rescue DVIU (40 patients), or third rescue DVIU (16 patients).…”
Section: Outcome Measurements and Statistical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Urethroplasty is a challenging surgical procedure with high risk of developing both intra-and postoperative complications, especially in those patients suffering from strictures with high-risk features. 1,2 Nevertheless, data on complications after urethroplasty are sparse in literature with a wide range of incidence reported (1%e38%). This heterogeneity might be explained by the variability in the definition and reporting of complications.…”
Section: Editorial Commentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previously, Kim et al identified the presence of positive preoperative cultures to be a risk factor for postoperative UTIs (OR 6.7, p[0.012). 2 The judicious use of antibiotics continues to be an area of emphasis, in an effort to minimize adverse effects and prevent antibiotic resistance. However, there is no standardized management paradigm used by reconstructive urologists.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%