1988
DOI: 10.1016/0001-6160(88)90002-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Grain boundary precipitation of M23C6 in an austenitic steel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most observations of other people's work showed that the carbide bars do not commonly connect with the incoherent twin boundary [5][6][7][8][9]14,31]. This is a misunderstanding due to the two dimensional observations.…”
Section: The Morphology Of Carbides Precipitated At Incoherent Twin Bmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Most observations of other people's work showed that the carbide bars do not commonly connect with the incoherent twin boundary [5][6][7][8][9]14,31]. This is a misunderstanding due to the two dimensional observations.…”
Section: The Morphology Of Carbides Precipitated At Incoherent Twin Bmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the observations of Refs. [5][6][7][8][9]14,31] are in two dimensional cross section of the carbide structure. If the observation cross section is parallel to the carbide bar as shown by plane 1 in Fig.…”
Section: The Morphology Of Carbides Precipitated At Incoherent Twin Bmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Early work on growth kinetics has been developed for the grain boundary case [4] and for intragranular precipitation [5]. These approaches have been integrated to produce a unified description of the inter-and intra-granular nucleation and growth mechanisms [6,7]. More recently, successful attempts have been made to combine models of precipitate growth at interfaces with concurrently occurring segregation in aluminium alloys [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%