“…for neglecting important information on the use of grammatical structures as well as lexical items in real language use and provided ample information about the mismatch and lack of fit between language used in the textbook and real language in use (Biber & Reppen, 2002;Carter & McCarthy, 1995;Frazier, 2003;Gilmore, 2004;Glisan & Drescher, 1993;Harwood, 2005;Holmes, 1988;Hyland, 1994;O'Connor Di Vito, 1991;Lawson, 2001;O'Keeffe, McCerthy & Carter, 2007;Mukundan & Roslim, 2009;Mukundan & Khojasteh, 2011;Romer, 2004a;Romer, 2004b). Surprisingly, all of these studies indeed demonstrate that although frequency information exhibit in computer databases has improved a lot, syllabus designers still tend to operate by hunch and neglect important and frequent features of the language spoken or written by real language users (Thornbury, 2004).…”