2017
DOI: 10.1002/2017je005320
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Granular avalanches on the Moon: Mass‐wasting conditions, processes, and features

Abstract: Seven lunar crater sites of granular avalanches are studied utilizing high‐resolution images (0.42–1.3 m/pixel) from the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Camera; one, in Kepler crater, is examined in detail. All the sites are slopes of debris extensively aggraded by frictional freezing at their dynamic angle of repose, four in craters formed in basaltic mare and three in the anorthositic highlands. Diverse styles of mass wasting occur, and three types of dry‐debris flow deposit are recognized: (1) multiple channel… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
89
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 126 publications
3
89
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Conway and Balme (2016) compared the morphometries of the catchments of martian gullies to dry mass wasting features on Earth (talus slopes), on the Moon and ungullied crater walls on Mars and found that martian gullies were statistically dissimilar from these nominally "dry" landforms. The runout of dry granular flows should not extend very far beyond slopes greater than the dynamic angle of repose (~20°; Kleinhans et al, 2011;Pouliquen, 1999) which has been confirmed to be the case for dry avalanches on the Moon (Kokelaar et al, 2017) yet the majority of martian gully-fans are shallower than this. Conway et al, 2015a, measured a median slope of 14° for 67 gully-fans and Kolb et al (2010) concluded 72% of the 76 fans they studied were likely emplaced by fluidised flows.…”
Section: Compositional Datamentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Conway and Balme (2016) compared the morphometries of the catchments of martian gullies to dry mass wasting features on Earth (talus slopes), on the Moon and ungullied crater walls on Mars and found that martian gullies were statistically dissimilar from these nominally "dry" landforms. The runout of dry granular flows should not extend very far beyond slopes greater than the dynamic angle of repose (~20°; Kleinhans et al, 2011;Pouliquen, 1999) which has been confirmed to be the case for dry avalanches on the Moon (Kokelaar et al, 2017) yet the majority of martian gully-fans are shallower than this. Conway et al, 2015a, measured a median slope of 14° for 67 gully-fans and Kolb et al (2010) concluded 72% of the 76 fans they studied were likely emplaced by fluidised flows.…”
Section: Compositional Datamentioning
confidence: 82%
“…In the most generic sense martian gullies are a form of gravity-driven mass wasting system, where material is removed from the top and transported towards the base of the hillslope. However, they are distinguishable from simple fall-deposits (scree, talus or colluvium) by the presence of the transport channel and/or chute as pointed out by Malin and Edgett (2000) and the presence of a depositional fan below the dynamic angle of repose (Kokelaar et al, 2017). Hence, it has generally been acknowledged that a channel is the essential attribute for identifying a martian gully (e.g., Balme et al, 2006).…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A reduction in friction during transport can occur via various proposed mechanisms (De Blasio, ; Legros, ; Voight et al, ). These include fluidization from air (Fahnestock, ; Kent, ; Shreve, ; Shreve, , ), suspension by particle distributions or vibrations (Hsü, ; Kokelaar et al, ; Melosh, ), and an increased mobility by warmed ice or liquid water (De Blasio, ; Erismann & Abele, ; Legros, ; Singer et al, ). The latter is commonly invoked for landslides on other planets (De Blasio, ; Lucchitta, ; Singer et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After a crater has been formed, its steep walls collapse gravitationally over time by mass wasting and topographic diffusion by continuous impact meteoroids on its surface; thermal contraction/expansion and seismic shaking due to internal geodynamic processes or ongoing bombardments nearby may also contribute to crater degradation (e.g., Fassett & Thomson, ; Kokelaar et al, ; Melosh, ). Fassett and Thomson () evaluated the degradation state of small mare craters with diameters ranging from 800 to 5 km by solving diffusion equations that fit topographic profiles of craters.…”
Section: Representative Trends Of Cratersmentioning
confidence: 99%