1990
DOI: 10.1111/his.1990.17.4.373
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Granular cell variant of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans

Abstract: Brief reports 375 References 3 . Davis 1. Shapiro L. Barall. Vulvitis circumscriota ~l a s m a cellularis. . . . . /. Am. Acad. ofDermatol. 1983: 8: 413-416. 4. Lauchlan SC. Metaplasias and neoplasias of Mullerian epithelium. Histopathology 1984: 8: 543-557. 5, Fox H, Wells M, Harris M, McWilliam LJ, Anderson G S . Enteric tumours of the lower female genital tract. Histopathology 1988: 12: 167-1 76. 1. Culling CFA. Reid PE. Burton ID, Dunn wL. A histochemical method of differentiating lower gastrointestinal mu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is very likely that, as in our series, similar lesions are filed as classic granular cell tumour, or probably even misread as other granular cell entities. And indeed, the illustration of the second case of granular dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans by Banerjee et al 12 reveals a granular exo-/endophytic lesion with sharp nodular demarcation and marked acanthosis, which could easily also be interpreted as a granular variant of deep penetrating dermatofibroma 13 . Unfortunately, in 1990 CD34 labelling had still not been established as a diagnostic marker of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans 14 , nor was there any mention of factor XIIIa, smooth muscle specific actin, or E9.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is very likely that, as in our series, similar lesions are filed as classic granular cell tumour, or probably even misread as other granular cell entities. And indeed, the illustration of the second case of granular dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans by Banerjee et al 12 reveals a granular exo-/endophytic lesion with sharp nodular demarcation and marked acanthosis, which could easily also be interpreted as a granular variant of deep penetrating dermatofibroma 13 . Unfortunately, in 1990 CD34 labelling had still not been established as a diagnostic marker of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans 14 , nor was there any mention of factor XIIIa, smooth muscle specific actin, or E9.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the first group it has been described in inflammatory processes, in areas of necrosis, in association with surgical trauma or other types of injury [6][7] . The latter group includes lesions such as dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans 8 , angiosarcoma of the skin 9 , basal-cell carcinoma 10 , benign and malignant smooth muscle and neural tumours, and other non-cutaneous tumours [11][12] . To our knowledge the only description of granular cell change in dermatofibroma is the abstract of the paper presented by Leboit and Barr at the 29th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Dermatopathology.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…include leiomyoma, schwannoma, dermatofibroma, angiosarcoma, leiomyosarcoma, basal cell carcinoma, dermatofibrosarcoma protruberans, atypical fibroxanthoma, 6,7,[8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] and the classical granular cell tumor, including its rare malignant analog. Immunoperoxidase studies are often necessary in the evaluation of tumor phenotype because of the similarities of some of the neoplasms.…”
Section: Pathological Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%