2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2009.11.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Granular disintegration of marble in nature: A thermal-mechanical origin for a grus and corestone landscape

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Assumptions and simplifications in the model include the following: We limit attention to grain‐scale subcritical cracking on subaerially exposed rock surfaces that—on the scale of grain‐size cracks—are nominally flat. Thus, we focus solely on formation of intergranular surface cracks having initial lengths, a o , on the order of the characteristic grain size, d g . This assumption is consistent with the observation that microfracture lengths in unweathered rock are typically on the order of the constituent grain size [ Nasseri et al , ]. Further, we assume that the characteristic critical crack length, a c , is also on the order of the characteristic grain size, again a reasonable assumption given the abundant field and laboratory evidence of the general propensity for rocks to granularly disaggregate [ Eppes and Griffing , ; Gómez‐Heras et al , ; Goudie , ; Siegesmund et al , ]. Thus, our modeling is limited to one—albeit common—style of rock cracking, granular disaggregation (Figure a). We use order of magnitude calculations to address the growth of cracks from their initial lengths to their critical lengths.…”
Section: Climate‐dependent Subcritical Cracking Modelmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Assumptions and simplifications in the model include the following: We limit attention to grain‐scale subcritical cracking on subaerially exposed rock surfaces that—on the scale of grain‐size cracks—are nominally flat. Thus, we focus solely on formation of intergranular surface cracks having initial lengths, a o , on the order of the characteristic grain size, d g . This assumption is consistent with the observation that microfracture lengths in unweathered rock are typically on the order of the constituent grain size [ Nasseri et al , ]. Further, we assume that the characteristic critical crack length, a c , is also on the order of the characteristic grain size, again a reasonable assumption given the abundant field and laboratory evidence of the general propensity for rocks to granularly disaggregate [ Eppes and Griffing , ; Gómez‐Heras et al , ; Goudie , ; Siegesmund et al , ]. Thus, our modeling is limited to one—albeit common—style of rock cracking, granular disaggregation (Figure a). We use order of magnitude calculations to address the growth of cracks from their initial lengths to their critical lengths.…”
Section: Climate‐dependent Subcritical Cracking Modelmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…(): surface parallel fractures (spalling), fabric parallel fractures, longitudinal fractures (those parallel to the long‐axis of the rock), and intergranular fractures. For the latter cracks, thermal stress is known to lead to granular disaggregation, particularly in coarse‐grained rocks (Gómez‐Heras et al ., ; Eppes and Griffing, ), and we see evidence for such cracking along mineral grain boundaries in this study, particularly in the relatively coarse, quartz rich metamorphic rocks of the North Carolina site. We see less granular disaggregation and more spalling in the fine grained, darker rocks of the Pennsylvania sites overall, as would be expected from this previous work.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Delbo et al () have attempted to resolve this confusion by casting their framework in terms of microscopic (grain‐scale) thermal stresses and macroscopic (boulder‐scale) thermal stresses; both of which may operate simultaneously on airless planetary bodies in the inner solar system. Indeed, the macroscopic (rock‐scale) stress is the driving force for N‐S oriented cracks observed on the Earth surface (Eppes et al, ; Eppes et al, ; McFadden et al, ), while the microscopic one is the root of granular disintegration in Earth rocks (Eppes & Griffing, ; Gómez‐Heras, Smith, & Fort, ; Hall & André, ). The fact that both mechanisms may be operating simultaneously makes linear scaling of Basilevsky et al () particularly problematic.…”
Section: The Continuum Mechanics Perspective On Thermal Stresses and mentioning
confidence: 99%