2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2016.12.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Graphene oxide as high-performance dielectric materials for capacitive pressure sensors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
128
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 216 publications
(129 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
1
128
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, considering the volume fraction for Milli-Q water, equal to V f ∼0.0361 at a weight fraction of 6.5 wt%, we find a value of 2.3 for the dielectric constant of the GO particles in Milli-Q water. Even if the two values found in Milli-Q water and IPA are just estimates of the dielectric constant of the particle, they are still significantly lower than the giant permittivity found in many other papers [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]30].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the other hand, considering the volume fraction for Milli-Q water, equal to V f ∼0.0361 at a weight fraction of 6.5 wt%, we find a value of 2.3 for the dielectric constant of the GO particles in Milli-Q water. Even if the two values found in Milli-Q water and IPA are just estimates of the dielectric constant of the particle, they are still significantly lower than the giant permittivity found in many other papers [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]30].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…As stated by the authors, these giant dielectric constants would arise from the orientational polarization of oxygen-containing groups at the surface of GO planes and along the edges [10,11]. Very large permittivities have also been reported for GO based foams and sensors in absence of humidity [11][12][13][14]. According to the authors, the capacitive behavior of GO paper for sensing shows a strong dependence on temperature and relative humidity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Only one capacitance‐type sponge sensor provided the higher initial sensitivity (0.8 kPa −1 ) . However, the operating stress range was limited within 4 kPa only . Generally, the sponge sensor with a higher sensitivity (0.8 or 0.18 kPa −1 ) had limited operating stress range (0–4 or 0–6.5 kPa), and the sensor with a greater operating range (0–10 kPa) had a smaller sensitivity (0.15 or 0.036 kPa −1 ) .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A 1000‐fold times resistance change can be realized within a pressure range of 1–70 kPa. Totally, the fabricated multimeter‐like pressure sensor shows a wide pressure range from <1 Pa to 72 kPa with different ultrahigh sensitivities using different sensing parts (15.22 kPa −1 for 0–300 Pa, 0.22 kPa −1 for 0.09–30 kPa, and 46.67 kPa −1 for 48–72 kPa), which present the prominent advantages in both the sensitivity and pressure range than some previous reports (Table S1, Supporting Information) …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%