2009
DOI: 10.1007/s11629-009-0120-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gravel accumulation in deposits of viscous debris flows with hyper-concentration

Abstract: According to the observational data of viscous debris flows with hyper-concentration, debris flows can be classified into three types: high-viscous, viscous, and sub-viscous debris flows. Distinct formation mechanism of different graded bedding structures in deposits of viscous debris flows was analyzed in this paper by using their yield-stress ratio and flow plug ratio. This paper specially analyzed the effect of Weissenberg which the gravels in squirm condition of hyper-concentration viscous flows would tend… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The loose debris was originally from easily-weathered slate, dolomite, and phyllite with a density corresponding to 2.65 t/m 3 . In addition, it is to be emphasized that the way that coarse and fine particles appeared in the vertical profile within loose debris was also considered on the basis of three vertical depositing patterns (i.e., normal, mixed, and inverse grading) reported in the earlier studies [36][37][38][39][40][41]. However, these findings of the vertical grading patterns were generally restricted to the post-event analysis and alluvial deposits.…”
Section: Factor Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The loose debris was originally from easily-weathered slate, dolomite, and phyllite with a density corresponding to 2.65 t/m 3 . In addition, it is to be emphasized that the way that coarse and fine particles appeared in the vertical profile within loose debris was also considered on the basis of three vertical depositing patterns (i.e., normal, mixed, and inverse grading) reported in the earlier studies [36][37][38][39][40][41]. However, these findings of the vertical grading patterns were generally restricted to the post-event analysis and alluvial deposits.…”
Section: Factor Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, coarse particles placed at the bottom layer and fine sediment on the top layer (Case E1, see Figure 2a), the coarse particles distributed on the top layer with fine grains at the bottom layer (Case E3, see Figure 2b), and both the coarse and fine particles fully mixed and covering the whole vertical profile (Case E2, see Figure 2c). In order to quantify this, a vertical grading coefficient ψ was proposed and written as In addition, it is to be emphasized that the way that coarse and fine particles appeared in the vertical profile within loose debris was also considered on the basis of three vertical depositing patterns (i.e., normal, mixed, and inverse grading) reported in the earlier studies [36][37][38][39][40][41]. However, these findings of the vertical grading patterns were generally restricted to the post-event analysis and alluvial deposits.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A typical bedding structure is that coarse grains (sometimes larger than 8 mm) accumulating on the surface, while the average grain size of the underlying layer is smaller poorly sorted (Enos, 1977;Major, 1995;Wang et al, 2009). This means that there exist roughening layers on the surface; and it is believed to influence the pore water pressure (Takahashi, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditionally, the debris-flow deposits have been commonly observed to demonstrate: (i) normal grading; (ii) disorderly/mixed grading; and (iii) inverse grading of their coarsest fragments in the vertical structure (Naylor, 1980;Major, 1994 and1997;Wang, 2009;Starheim et al, 2013). However, these findings are typically restricted to the post-event analysis and used to infer information on the physical properties of debris flow, which is highly questionable since the accumulation of sediments could potentially be induced by a discrete pulse of single flow or an individual flow (Major, 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%