2023
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2301.06515
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gravitational Waves from a Core g-Mode in Supernovae as Probes of the High-Density Equation of State

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is also evidence for some GW power in the "bumped" g-mode (that thereafter trends to lower frequencies), seen just after the mode repulsion in Figures 5 and 6, but most clearly in Figure 17 below. This is a qualitatively similar feature to that highlighted recently in [89]. Nevertheless, within ∼0.3 to ∼1.0 seconds (depending upon the progenitor) most power is clearly in the f-mode, where it persists thereafter.…”
Section: Avoided Crossing and Trapped G-modesupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There is also evidence for some GW power in the "bumped" g-mode (that thereafter trends to lower frequencies), seen just after the mode repulsion in Figures 5 and 6, but most clearly in Figure 17 below. This is a qualitatively similar feature to that highlighted recently in [89]. Nevertheless, within ∼0.3 to ∼1.0 seconds (depending upon the progenitor) most power is clearly in the f-mode, where it persists thereafter.…”
Section: Avoided Crossing and Trapped G-modesupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Though we have endeavored here to provide a comprehensive look at the gravitational-wave signatures of core collapse, there remains much yet to understand. Topics unaddressed here are the nuclear equation-of-state dependencies, the role of rapid rotation, the possible signatures of strong magnetic fields [36,89](REF), and the results for other progenitor massive stars and from other stellar evolution codes. Importantly, the analysis of a detected GW signal would be significantly aided if done in concert with a corresponding analysis of the simultaneous neutrino signal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the useful features in the proposed method is that we can apply it even in cases with no detection of GWs. This is a great advantage compared to other proposed GW-neutrino analysis, for instance GW spectrogram analysis [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17], that commonly requires GW data with high S/N.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many previous theoretical studies to understand characteristic features of GWs and neutrino signals (see reviews, e.g., [1] for GWs and [2][3][4] for neutrinos and references therein). GW spectrogram analysis based on multi-dimensional (multi-D) simulations is one of major approaches to probe the interior physics of CCSNe [5][6][7][8][9]. This analysis can also be complemented by linear analysis (or asteroseismology) of the proto-neutron star (PNS) [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17] or neutrino signal [18][19][20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies have sought to understand the hydrodynamic source of GWs and detection prospects of these signals using two-and three-dimensional models of core collapse (Marek et al 2009;Murphy et al 2009;Müller et al 2013;Yakunin et al 2015;Kuroda et al 2016;Nakamura et al 2016;Andresen et al 2017;Powell & Müller 2019;Radice et al 2019;Mezzacappa et al 2020;Vartanyan & Burrows 2020;Andresen et al 2021;Takiwaki et al 2021;Bugli et al 2023;Mezzacappa et al 2023;Vartanyan et al 2023). In pursuit of core-collapse GW phenomenology, some recent work has found that the frequency structure of GWs produced by the collapse of astrophysically rare progenitors may depend on the equation of state (EOS); for example, Richers et al (2017) with rotating models of core collapse, and Jakobus et al (2023) with two high-mass (35 M e and 85 M e ), zero-metallicity progenitors. However, due to the extreme computational cost of multidimensional models, it is not yet possible to fully explore the observational consequences of core-collapse GWs across a landscape of stellar progenitor properties, nuclear EOS configurations, and other relevant (astro)physics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%