2014
DOI: 10.1007/s00190-014-0764-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gravity field processing with enhanced numerical precision for LL-SST missions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It should be emphasized that for all simulation results that have been shown here there is a signicant potential of further optimization regarding (a) the orbit con guration, and (b) the processing schemes, which will have to be further investigated in more depth for the high-low scenario. First numerical closed-loop simulations applying a full-scale simulation tool (Daras et al 2015) largely con rm the results presented here. They will be part of future work.…”
Section: Numerical Simulation and Resultssupporting
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It should be emphasized that for all simulation results that have been shown here there is a signicant potential of further optimization regarding (a) the orbit con guration, and (b) the processing schemes, which will have to be further investigated in more depth for the high-low scenario. First numerical closed-loop simulations applying a full-scale simulation tool (Daras et al 2015) largely con rm the results presented here. They will be part of future work.…”
Section: Numerical Simulation and Resultssupporting
confidence: 71%
“…where ρ w and ρ e represent the average densities of water and Earth, athe semi-major axis of the Earth, and kn the load Love number of degree n. Another important issue related to the choice of optimal orbit heights is the reduction of temporal aliasing due to under-sampling. In (Murböck et al 2015) a number of optimal orbit altitude bands are identi ed, where the impact of temporal aliasing is signi cantly reduced. Several numerical simulations have shown, that regarding orbit choice and related ground track coverage there is some design freedom, provided that the repeat period of the LEOs is long enough to guarantee su cient spatial resolution and avoiding spatial undersampling.…”
Section: Technical Concepts Observation Conceptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TUM: All simulations were executed with a full-scale numerical mission simulator [25,26], which has already been successfully applied in real data applications to recover satellite-only gravitational field models for CHAMP (Challenging Mini-Satellite Payload), GRACE and GOCE. The simulation environment is based on numerical orbit integration following a multistep method [27], which applies a modified divided difference form of the Adams-Bashforth-Moulton Predict-Evaluate-Correct-Evaluate (PECE) formulas and local extrapolation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All simulations were executed with a full numerical mission simulator [33,34], which has already been successfully applied to recover satellite-only gravitational field models from GOCE data [35]. The simulation environment is based on numerical orbit integration, following a multistep method for the numerical integration according to Shampine & Gordon 1976 [36], which applies a modified divided difference form of the Adams predict-evaluate-correct-evaluate (PECE) formulas and local extrapolation.…”
Section: Simulation Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%