1990
DOI: 10.1016/0040-1951(90)90265-a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gravity modelling along the Southern Segment of the European geotraverse from the Gulf of Genoa to the Swiss Molasse Basin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Little is known about possible general differences between the lithospheres of the European and the African/Adriatic plates though in several gravity studies (see e.g. Kahle et al 1980;Lyon-Caen & Molnar 1989;Cassinis, Cassano & Vincenzo 1990) this was considered a possible explanation of some deficiencies in the gravity models. Differences in the lithospheric structures seem more likely than differences in the velocity-density relationships applying to these two…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Little is known about possible general differences between the lithospheres of the European and the African/Adriatic plates though in several gravity studies (see e.g. Kahle et al 1980;Lyon-Caen & Molnar 1989;Cassinis, Cassano & Vincenzo 1990) this was considered a possible explanation of some deficiencies in the gravity models. Differences in the lithospheric structures seem more likely than differences in the velocity-density relationships applying to these two…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To reduce the errors introduced by lateral variations of the near-surface structures inaccountable by 2.5-D gravity modelling, the effects of the sediments of the Po Plain, the Molasse Basin, and the larger Alpine valleys were calculated with 3-D models Schwendener 1984;Cassano et al 1990;Kissling & Schwendener 1990) and subtracted from the measured Bouguer gravity. The resulting gravity is termed observed gravity anomaly and compares with the gravity effect of the broader lithospheric structures accounted for by 2.5-D gravity modelling with a technique following Talwani, Worzel & Landisman (1959) and Cady (1980) (Fig.…”
Section: G R a V I T Y Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%