1982
DOI: 10.1029/gl009i005p00571
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gravity‐wave generation by thunderstorms observed with a vertically‐pointing 430 MHz radar

Abstract: During September of 1979, the Arecibo Observatory 430 MHz Doppler radar was used to study the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere during thunderstorm activity in the afternoon hours. It was found that when the clouds developed sufficiently in the vertical direction to reach the height of the tropopause, gravity‐wave oscillations in the vertical velocity above the tropopause would develop. The amplitude was 2 m/s, and the period was close to 6 min.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
35
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
3
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…10, it is found that the smallest wavelength of which the wave is internal becomes larger when the phase velocity gets faster. Larsen et al (1982) observed stratospheric wave motions above tropospheric convections, and found a high frequency wave with a period of 6 min and the vertical wavelength of 7 km. The dominant waves in the present model simulation are consistent with these high frequency IGWs observed in the real atmosphere in spite of the difference of the convection mechanism.…”
Section: Convection and Igws Propagationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10, it is found that the smallest wavelength of which the wave is internal becomes larger when the phase velocity gets faster. Larsen et al (1982) observed stratospheric wave motions above tropospheric convections, and found a high frequency wave with a period of 6 min and the vertical wavelength of 7 km. The dominant waves in the present model simulation are consistent with these high frequency IGWs observed in the real atmosphere in spite of the difference of the convection mechanism.…”
Section: Convection and Igws Propagationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It solves the linear solutions in a locally unsheared environment with a constant buoyancy frequency. Observations and simulations show that there are typically many small updrafts within the "envelope" of a convectively unstable region, which give rise to a GW spectrum concentrated at small-scales of ∼5-10 km (e.g., Larsen et al, 1982;Alexander et al, 1995). Our model neglects the individual updrafts which generate these small-scale GWs, as these GWs are not likely to propagate to the upper atmosphere and thermosphere (due to wave breaking, critical level absorption, and reflection in the stratosphere).…”
Section: Convective Plume Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that there is no mean response to a vertical body force. Since we are modeling the excitation of GWs from convective overshoot, which produces very high-frequency GWs with 5-20 min periods (e.g., Larsen et al, 1982;Alexander et al, 1995), we can neglect the Earth's rotation by setting f =0. Then k 2 ω 2 =k 2 H N 2 and A F =ω 2 F z /N 2 .…”
Section: Gravity Wave Solutions For Vertical Body Forcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, the unresolved questions related to the seed perturbation could be stated as: (1) possibility of insitu generation of the gravity waves through (a) motion of the solar terminator across the lower thermosphere, (b) evening F-layer rise permitting zonal wind acceleration and associated strong vertical shear (Anderson et al, 1982), and (c) deposition of momentum at z∼180 km from the dissipation of gravity waves from the lower atmosphere (Vadas and Fritts, 2006), (2) remote sources such as tropospheric convection activity that could produce upward propagating gravity waves (Rottger, 1981;Larsen and Swartz, 1982;Lane et al, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%