2010
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637x/714/1/904
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gravity Waves on Hot Extrasolar Planets. I. Propagation and Interaction With the Background

Abstract: We study the effects of gravity waves, or g-modes, on hot extrasolar planets. These planets are expected to possess stably-stratified atmospheres, which support gravity waves. In this paper, we review the derivation of the equation that governs the linear dynamics of gravity waves and describe its application to a hot extrasolar planet, using HD 209458 b as a generic example. We find that gravity waves can exhibit a wide range of behaviors, even for a single atmospheric profile. The waves can significantly acc… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
33
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, heating and fluctuations induced by gravity waves (including tides), which are also not included, may appreciably affect some of the estimates reported here (Watkins & Cho 2010).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similarly, heating and fluctuations induced by gravity waves (including tides), which are also not included, may appreciably affect some of the estimates reported here (Watkins & Cho 2010).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…If similar values prevail on an EGP, its homopause would be located between 1 and 10 μbar. However, K τ can be higher than the Jovian value for extrasolar planets-especially for close-in EGPs, due to the larger H p and possible stronger turbulent velocity (Watkins & Cho 2010).…”
Section: The Upper and Lower Boundariesmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…We have checked that the spatial distribution of the temperature above 1 bar is almost identical during the two phases (not shown) and cannot be responsible for the jet velocity decrease. It is instead likely that the small-scale velocity fluctuations associated with the vertical shear instability act as a form of drag that slows down the jet, possibly mediated by gravity waves (see Watkins & Cho 2010) and, as shown above, by shocks, both excited by the vertical shear instability. Given the limitations of the numerical setup used here, a detailed and quantitative investigation of this possibility is beyond the scope of this paper, but opens up the possibility of developing a physically motivated subgrid scale model for the dissipation in the atmosphere of hot Jupiters that could be incorporated into traditional GCMs.…”
Section: Dissipation In the Deep Atmosphere And Implications For The mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Brightness maps Majeau et al 2012) and wind velocities (Snellen et al 2010) are now accessible, and constraints on the composition are becoming available, but large uncertainties remain. Observations indicate a hotspot shifted eastward of the substellar point Majeau et al 2012) and temperature contrasts smaller than what is expected for these planets without winds (Knutson et al , 2009, indicating transport of heat from the day-side to the night-side (Watkins & Cho 2010;Perez-Becker & Showman 2013). HD 209458b appears to have a temperature inversion in its upper atmosphere Burrows et al 2007) while HD 189733b does not Barman 2008;Knutson et al 2009), indicating that, despite similar orbital properties, hot Jupiters may have very different circulation patterns that still need to be understood.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%