2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2011.12.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Grazing exclusion affects soil and plant communities, but has no impact on soil carbon storage in an upland grassland

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
96
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 168 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
10
96
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…AGB in grazing management sites was significantly lower than that in fencing and mowing sites, which was accordance with results from Medina-Roldan et al (2012), who found that grassland production could be relatively decreased in grazing areas because of livestock′s consumption. A higher BGB amount was observed in top soil layer of fencing pattern than that in grazing pattern.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…AGB in grazing management sites was significantly lower than that in fencing and mowing sites, which was accordance with results from Medina-Roldan et al (2012), who found that grassland production could be relatively decreased in grazing areas because of livestock′s consumption. A higher BGB amount was observed in top soil layer of fencing pattern than that in grazing pattern.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…3a) and the mean height of community ( Fig. 3b) with the increase in grazing intensity (yaks hm −2 ) (P < 0.001, Table 3), probably resulting from the bite effect of grazing livestock (Medina-Roldán et al 2012;Zhu et al 2016).…”
Section: X) and The Vegetation Characteristics (Y)mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…And functionally, grazing alters the flow of energy and the cycling of materials (Altesor et al 2005;Pineiro et al 2006). Abundant evidence demonstrates that the bite effect of grazing livestock reduces the vegetation coverage and the height of community (Medina-Roldán et al 2012;Zhu et al 2016). The influence of grazing on the plant community lies in two ways, i.e., the direct impact through diet preference and trampling of livestock on plant's survival, growth, and fecundity and the indirect one by altering the intraspecific and interspecific interactions or the water and nutrient availability (Wan et al 2010).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…grazing did not compromise the carbon-storage potential (Medina-Roldán et al, 2012). Carbon storage was strongly modulated, however, by location, soil type (Marriott et al, 2010), stocking rate (Martinsen et al, 2011) and grassland management (Soussana et al, 2004).…”
Section: An Inventory Of the Es Provided By Plfs In Europementioning
confidence: 99%