2004
DOI: 10.1201/9780203497784.ch20
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Great Britain — conifers to broadleaves

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Afforestation projects in some European countries have also included a disproportionally large share of conifers and monocultures (see e.g. Harmer et al, 2005;Mansourian et al, 2005;Zanchi et al, 2007;Brockerhoff et al, 2008). A disproportionate share of some conifers in subsidy design may damage longerterm viability of incentivised afforestation projects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Afforestation projects in some European countries have also included a disproportionally large share of conifers and monocultures (see e.g. Harmer et al, 2005;Mansourian et al, 2005;Zanchi et al, 2007;Brockerhoff et al, 2008). A disproportionate share of some conifers in subsidy design may damage longerterm viability of incentivised afforestation projects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Important reasons for the development and use of this practice include a reduction in a forest's susceptibility to wind and other environmental stresses, and improvement in biodiversity value (Lust et al 1998;Zerbe 2002;Stanturf and Madsen 2005;Von Lüpke 2004;Dedrick et al 2007). In Great Britain, conversion has concentrated on the restoration of native broadleaved woodland from conifer plantations situated on ancient woodland sites, the major driver for this being the probable gain in biodiversity value (Harmer et al 2005b). Such ancient woodland sites have had tree cover for several centuries (Peterken 1996), and as the conifer plantations were only established in the middle of the twentieth century, they are regarded as prime sites for conversion (Thompson et al 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%