2002
DOI: 10.1093/beheco/13.6.725
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Great tits (Parus major) reduce body mass in response to wing area reduction: a field experiment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
31
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
31
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, feather damage resulting from fault bars may reduce wing-tail surface area for long time periods. All of this is relevant for bird fitness because wing load (body weight/wing area) is crucial for flight performance (Pennycuick 1989), birds being forced to reduce their weight during even slight reductions of wing area # JOURNAL OF AVIAN BIOLOGY JOURNAL OF AVIAN BIOLOGY 37: 29 Á/35, 2006 JOURNAL OF AVIAN BIOLOGY 37:1 (2006) (Swaddle and Witter 1997, Lind and Jakobson 2001, Senar et al 2002. Moreover, experimental reductions of wing area are known to increase the energetic demands of birds, lowering their reproductive success (Mauck andGrubb 1995, Velando 2002).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, feather damage resulting from fault bars may reduce wing-tail surface area for long time periods. All of this is relevant for bird fitness because wing load (body weight/wing area) is crucial for flight performance (Pennycuick 1989), birds being forced to reduce their weight during even slight reductions of wing area # JOURNAL OF AVIAN BIOLOGY JOURNAL OF AVIAN BIOLOGY 37: 29 Á/35, 2006 JOURNAL OF AVIAN BIOLOGY 37:1 (2006) (Swaddle and Witter 1997, Lind and Jakobson 2001, Senar et al 2002. Moreover, experimental reductions of wing area are known to increase the energetic demands of birds, lowering their reproductive success (Mauck andGrubb 1995, Velando 2002).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increased mass may allow for more rapid moult, or may be traded off against moult duration and frequency so that there is no direct relationship between mass and fitness (eg Senar et al 1998, Bojarinova et al 1999, or may be reduced during moult to compensate for reduced flying ability (Lind & Jakobsson 2001, Senar et al 2002.…”
Section: Moultmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This ability can be influenced by the quality, age and condition of the individual (Fox et al 2001). Individual quality and condition can be signalled to potential mates or rivals by various types of ornaments, including those based on carotenoids (Searcy and Nowicki 2005). Carotenoid-based colouration is widespread in animals, including feathers and bare parts in birds (Olson and Owens 2005).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Birds can be handicapped by adding weights (Wright and Cuthill 1989;Griggio et al 2005), taping their feathers (Senar et al 2002a) or feather clipping (Slagsvold and Lifjeld 1988;Sanz et al 2000). The last method is particularly suitable because it simulates events that can happen in the wild due to attacks by predators, and hence represents a risk to which birds might have become adapted (Slagsvold and Lifjeld 1990).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%