Green Campus Initiative: Transforming Law  in Book Into Law in Action

Shahrullah, Rina Shahriyani; Fitrianingrum, Agustina; Lestari, R.A. Widyanti Diah

doi:10.22146/jmh.16065

Cited by 4 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Some universities choose to develop their social responsibility practices by putting their attention and participation in greater depth on the issue of global warming. University participation in minimizing global warming is called the Green Campus Initiative (Shahrullah et al , 2014). This Green Campus Program provides a means to foster environmental awareness by offering clear and controlled methods for the campus in an effort to take environmental issues, innovations and research from academic departments and apply them to daily campus management.…”

Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning

confidence: 99%

Constructing CSR student self-consciousness through university social responsibility implementation: evidence in Indonesia

Agustina

Meyliana

Rasni

2022

SRJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose The role of higher education institutions is paramount in creating social and cultural conditions for sustainability. Several studies show universities play an important role in promoting public understanding and awareness about sustainability. The purpose of this study is to analyze the application of university social responsibility (USR) on green and nongreen campuses and how it affects the corporate social responsibility (CSR) of students' self-consciousness (SSC), especially in accounting undergraduate programs by looking at how the undergraduate programs shape their curriculum and can build student awareness related to CSR. Design/methodology/approach A total of 704 accounting undergraduate programs students from eight different universities in Indonesia were surveyed to test the CSR SSC. Eight participating universities were included in the green campus based on Universitas Indonesia Green Metric (UI GreenMetric) and nongreen campus. Each university was analyzed regarding the application of USR. Findings The results of this study show that universities included in the green campus at the UI GreenMetric do not necessarily have a higher USR than the nongreen campus. Overall, there is evidence that graduates from universities with high USR implementation have better CSR SSC than graduates from universities with low USR implementation. Furthermore, the findings of this study show that there is a high value of ethic and CSR knowledge coming from university students with high USR implementation but not so with character. The findings show the same results from students between the two university groups. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this study is the first attempt to examine the effect of USR implementation on CSR SSC in Indonesia, by putting students’ CSR knowledge as a part of CSR SSC.

show abstract

Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning

confidence: 99%

Constructing CSR student self-consciousness through university social responsibility implementation: evidence in Indonesia

Agustina

Meyliana

Rasni

2022

SRJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Standards of sustainable campus mainly divided into four categories, namely, Academics, Engagement, Operations and Planning and Administration (AASHE, 2019). The construction evaluation of green campus is also carried out from these four aspects, and its scientific and comprehensive evaluation system has attracted the wide participation of many universities around the world (Shahrullah, 2014). The concept of green campus was first put forward in China in 1996 .…”

Section: Research Approach Chartmentioning

confidence: 99%

A comparison on the evaluation standards of sustainable campus between China and America

Zhu

Liu

Jing

2021

IJSHE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose This paper aims to make a comparative study on the latest version of green campus evaluation standard between China and America: Green Campus Evaluation Standard (GB/T51356-2019) and the sustainability tracking, assessment and rating system (STARS 2.2). The differences of evaluation methods and contents are analyzed and their respective characteristics and advantages are sorted out, so as to promote the development of sustainable campus evaluation standards. Design/methodology/approach The research mainly adopts the method of comparative study, which is carried out from three dimensions, namely, the related policies development of campus construction and world university sustainable rankings; the content of evaluation standards (including evaluation methods and evaluation categories and scores); the characteristics and current application of standards. Findings There are great differences between the evaluation standards of China and America in organization and participation mode, evaluation method and content. Public engagement, energy and campus engagement are the hot spots. Buildings, energy, food and dining and investment and finance will become the focus of sustainable campus in the future. Specific optimization strategies of key points, evaluation method and content and organization and participation mode of Chinese standard are put forward. Practical implications This paper clarifies the advantages and disadvantages of the current global sustainable campus, and provides the basis for the next stage of construction policy. At the same time, it is helpful for all countries, especially China, to formulate construction guidelines that not only meet their own actual needs but also conform to the trend of global sustainable campus development. Social implications The connotation of sustainable campus is enriched, and the evaluation standards of sustainable campus are improved. The development of sustainable campus is promoted, so as to realize the sustainable development goals. Originality/value This research expands the scope of the study to the whole campus, rather than just one aspect of campus buildings. It compares the evaluation standard of green campus in China with STARS in the USA, and no longer compares leadership in energy and environmental design for schools. It discusses the campus building’s energy conservation while paying attention to the campus green consciousness, green management and green planning. Based on the relevant data currently used by STARS in the global evaluation, this paper analyzes the hot spots and shortcomings of the current global sustainable campus construction and puts forward some optimization suggestions for China’s green campus evaluation system.

show abstract

“…Shortly, the green campus is a sustainable environmental management system to create an environmental-based campus and aimed to resolve the current environmental problems. Green Campus Initiative in Indonesia had been implemented by Universitas Indonesia since 2008 [2]. The term green campus itself was popularized by Harvard University since 2000.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Universitas Gadjah Mada Drinking Water Supply System (UGM-DWSS) Potential on Supporting Green Campus Program in Universitas Gadjah Mada

Fahrianto

Supraba

Triatmadja

et al. 2018

AMM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Green Campus is a campus environment that is designed to increase energy efficiency, preserve resource and improve the quality of the environment. One of the important elements to support the green campus program is the existence of drinking water supply system.Universitas Gadjah Mada Drinking Water Supply System (UGM-DWSS) is a drinking water or potable water supply service to supply drinking water for the campus. This research aims at analyzing UGM-DWSS potential and its performance to support Green Campus. This research was based on primary data collection in UGM campus. Data collection techniques consist of observation of UGM-DWSS facilities, interview with UGM-DWSS water managers and users, and questionnaires distribution to UGM academic community. The daily water production of UGM-DWSS was 10 l/s drinking water. Every day the water discharge distributed from UGM-DWSS to 49 water fountains and 12 water dispensers was1.71 l/s, while the estimated daily water consumption rate was0.07l/s. It is assumed that those who did not consume water from UGM-DWSS facilities bought plastic drinking water bottle. Every day, it is estimated that the number of generated plastic drinking water bottle waste was 19,168 bottles with capacity 600 ml/bottle. Indeed, by comparing to the total water production capacity being produced daily, the idle capacity was 99.3 %.The tendency of negative response from the majority of UGM inhabitants for using UGM –DWSS was due to hesitation about water quality, continuity of water supply, and ease of access to the nearby water fountains and water dispensers. Improvement of UGM-DWSS facilities that are supported by massive socialization programs including innovation to utilize produced drinking water is recommended to optimize the role of UGM-DWSS to create Green Campus.

show abstract

Green Campus Initiative: Transforming Law in Book Into Law in Action

Cited by 4 publications

References 1 publication

Constructing CSR student self-consciousness through university social responsibility implementation: evidence in Indonesia

Constructing CSR student self-consciousness through university social responsibility implementation: evidence in Indonesia

A comparison on the evaluation standards of sustainable campus between China and America

Universitas Gadjah Mada Drinking Water Supply System (UGM-DWSS) Potential on Supporting Green Campus Program in Universitas Gadjah Mada

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About